Inventory Restock Forecast with n8n & Vector Store

Inventory Restock Forecast with n8n & Vector Store

Automating inventory restock decisions helps you avoid stockouts, reduce excess stock, and keep fulfillment running smoothly. This guide walks you through an n8n workflow template called “Inventory Restock Forecast” and explains, step by step, how it works and how to deploy it.

You will learn how the workflow:

  • Receives inventory data through a webhook
  • Splits and embeds text into vectors
  • Stores and queries vectors in a Supabase vector store
  • Uses an Anthropic-powered agent to make restock recommendations
  • Logs every recommendation into Google Sheets for review

Learning goals

By the end of this tutorial you should be able to:

  • Understand the high-level architecture of the Inventory Restock Forecast n8n template
  • Configure all required credentials and services (Cohere, Supabase, Anthropic, Google Sheets)
  • Customize text splitting, embeddings, and vector queries for your inventory data
  • Explain how the agent uses vector search results to produce restock recommendations
  • Adapt and troubleshoot the workflow for different business contexts such as ecommerce, wholesale, or retail chains

Concept overview: What this n8n workflow does

This n8n automation combines embeddings, a vector store, and an LLM agent to generate context-aware restock suggestions. It is designed to work with unstructured or semi-structured inventory data such as product descriptions, historical sales notes, and vendor details.

Why use this workflow?

The Inventory Restock Forecast template is useful if you want to:

  • Make faster and more consistent restock decisions based on historical context and product signals
  • Search large unstructured inventory documents using vector similarity instead of simple keyword search
  • Maintain an automated log and audit trail in Google Sheets for reporting and human review
  • Have an extensible foundation where you can swap models, adjust chunk sizes, and add your own business rules

High-level architecture of the template

At a high level, the workflow moves through these stages:

  1. Webhook – Receives incoming inventory updates or historical documents via HTTP POST.
  2. Text Splitter – Breaks long text into smaller chunks using configurable chunkSize and chunkOverlap values.
  3. Embeddings – Sends these chunks to Cohere (or another provider) to generate vector embeddings.
  4. Supabase Insert – Stores the embedding vectors in a Supabase index called inventory_restock_forecast.
  5. Vector Query & Tool – Performs similarity search to retrieve the most relevant context for each query.
  6. Memory – Maintains a short conversation buffer so the agent can remember recent context.
  7. Chat (LM) & Agent – Uses Anthropic to reason about the data, call the vector tool when needed, and generate recommendations.
  8. Google Sheets – Writes the final recommendation and metadata into a sheet as a log entry.

Next, we will walk through how to deploy and configure this template in n8n, then look in more detail at how the agent makes its decisions.

Step-by-step: Deploying the Inventory Restock Forecast template

Step 1 – Import the template into n8n

  1. Open your n8n instance and go to the Workflows section.
  2. Use the Import option to upload the provided JSON template file.
  3. After import, visually inspect the workflow:
    • Confirm all nodes are present (Webhook, Splitter, Embeddings, Supabase, Agent, Google Sheets, etc.).
    • Check that connections between nodes match the intended data flow.

Step 2 – Configure required credentials

The template relies on several external services. In n8n, open each node that uses external APIs and attach or create the correct credentials.

  • Cohere (Embeddings)
    • Provide your Cohere API key in the credentials section.
    • Ensure the embeddings node is set to use these credentials.
  • Supabase (Vector Store)
    • Enter your Supabase URL and service key.
    • Confirm that the pgvector extension is enabled in your Supabase database.
    • Make sure the table and index for inventory_restock_forecast exist and are configured for vector similarity queries.
  • Anthropic (Agent & Chat)
    • Add your Anthropic API credentials.
    • Attach them to the Chat/Agent node that generates recommendations.
  • Google Sheets (Logging)
    • Set up OAuth2 credentials for Google Sheets.
    • Create or specify a sheet (for example, a sheet named Log).
    • In the Google Sheets node, point the workflow to this sheet or adjust the node settings to match your preferred sheet name.

Step 3 – Tune text splitting and embeddings

Before sending real data, it is important to understand how text splitting and embeddings work in this template.

Text splitter configuration

The template uses the following default values:

  • chunkSize = 400
  • chunkOverlap = 40

These values are a good starting point for product descriptions and purchase histories. You can adjust them based on your documents:

  • For longer documents, consider a smaller chunkSize or a higher chunkOverlap to capture more context around each sentence.
  • For short, focused descriptions, you can often keep the defaults or even reduce overlap to speed up processing.

Choosing an embeddings provider

The template is configured to use Cohere for embeddings, which balances latency and accuracy for many inventory use cases.

You can switch to other providers if needed:

  • OpenAI
  • Hugging Face
  • Other embeddings APIs supported by n8n

To change providers, update the Embeddings node configuration and attach the appropriate credentials.

Step 4 – Create and test the webhook

The workflow begins with a Webhook node that listens for POST requests. In the template, this is typically configured with a path such as:

/inventory_restock_forecast

Send a test POST request with a JSON payload that includes product details and recent activity. For example:

{  "product_id": "SKU-12345",  "description": "Red cotton t-shirts - monthly sales history and reorder points...",  "last_30d_sales": 150
}

After sending the request:

  • Check that the Splitter node receives the payload and creates chunks.
  • Verify that the Embeddings node processes each chunk without errors.
  • Open your Supabase dashboard to confirm that vectors are inserted into the inventory_restock_forecast table.

Once this basic data flow is working, you are ready to explore how the agent uses these vectors to make restock decisions.

How the n8n agent generates restock recommendations

From vector search to decision

When you trigger a restock query, the workflow performs the following logical steps:

  1. Vector similarity search
    • The Query node calls the Supabase vector index inventory_restock_forecast.
    • It retrieves the most relevant vectors based on the incoming product data, such as sales history, notes, or vendor lead times.
  2. Context assembly
    • The retrieved chunks are combined into a context package for the agent.
    • This context may include past sales, reorder patterns, supplier performance, and other product signals.
  3. Agent reasoning with Anthropic
    • The Anthropic-powered agent receives:
      • New input data (current stock, recent sales velocity, etc.)
      • Retrieved context from the vector store
      • Business rules defined in the prompt
    • Using this information, the agent calculates:
      • A recommended order quantity
      • A priority level (for example, urgent vs normal restock)
      • A textual rationale explaining the decision
  4. Memory buffer
    • A short-term memory node keeps track of recent interactions.
    • This allows the agent to maintain continuity, especially if you query multiple related products in sequence.

Designing the agent prompt

The quality of recommendations depends heavily on the prompt attached to the Agent node. A clear prompt should define:

Inputs available to the agent

  • Current stock level
  • Sales in the last 30 days or another relevant period
  • Vendor lead times and variability
  • Any notes or constraints stored in the vector database

Business rules to apply

Examples of rules you might include in the prompt:

  • Maintain at least 14 days of safety stock.
  • Respect minimum order quantities (for example, at least 50 units per order).
  • Take into account supplier lead time and known delays.

Output format for easier downstream use

To make the output machine readable and easy to log, define a structured format such as JSON. For example, instruct the agent to return:

  • product_id
  • recommended_qty
  • priority (for example, “high”, “medium”, “low”)
  • rationale explaining the reasoning in plain language

By standardizing this format, you make it easier to integrate the recommendations with other systems such as ERP or purchasing tools.

Logging recommendations in Google Sheets

After the agent produces a recommendation, the workflow sends the result to a Google Sheets node. This creates a running log of all restock decisions.

What gets logged

Each row in the sheet (for example, in a sheet named Log) can include:

  • Timestamp of the recommendation
  • Product ID
  • Recommended order quantity
  • Priority level and rationale
  • A context snippet or reference to the vectors/IDs used

This log acts as an audit trail. Buyers and managers can:

  • Review past recommendations
  • Compare them with actual purchase decisions and outcomes
  • Export the data into procurement or BI systems for analysis

Best practices for scaling and reliability

As you move from testing to production, consider the following best practices.

Indexing strategy in Supabase

  • Use product-level metadata such as product_id, category, and vendor to tag your vectors.
  • Filter queries by these tags when possible to narrow the search space and improve performance.

Data housekeeping

  • Re-embed documents after significant changes such as updated pricing, changed lead times, or revised product descriptions.
  • Remove or archive outdated vectors that no longer reflect current business reality.

Handling rate limits and throughput

  • Batch incoming webhook submissions if you expect high volume.
  • Use n8n concurrency and rate limit controls on the Embeddings and Agent nodes to avoid provider throttling.

Security considerations

  • Protect your webhook with authentication or IP allowlists if possible.
  • Use service keys for Supabase and never expose them in public workflows.
  • Store API keys and secrets only in n8n credentials, not in plain text fields.

Monitoring and error handling

  • Add error handling branches to catch failures in:
    • Embeddings generation
    • Supabase inserts
    • Agent responses
  • Send alerts to a notification channel such as Slack or email when errors occur.

Adapting the workflow to different business types

The core template is generic, but small adjustments can make it more effective for specific industries.

Ecommerce stores

For ecommerce, consider:

  • Integrating detailed order history and SKU-level unit economics.
  • Using shorter chunk sizes to capture line-item details and recent customer reviews or comments.
  • Emphasizing seasonality and promotions in your agent prompt.

Wholesale and B2B suppliers

For wholesale or B2B operations, it is often important to:

  • Incorporate minimum order quantities and vendor-specific lead time variability.
  • Store supply contracts and terms as vectors so the agent can reference them.
  • Include large account commitments and contract dates in the context.

Retail chains and multi-location businesses

Retail chains may want to:

  • Include location-level sales velocity and stock levels.
  • Model stock transfers between locations as an alternative to new purchase orders.
  • Use the memory buffer to keep track of recent interactions for each location-product combination.

Troubleshooting: Common issues and quick checks

  • No vectors

Build a Car Insurance Quote Generator with n8n

How to Build a Car Insurance Quote Generator with n8n and Vector AI

This guide describes a production-ready n8n workflow template for generating personalized car insurance quotes. It uses n8n as the orchestration layer and integrates LangChain-style components, Hugging Face embeddings, Pinecone as a vector database, Anthropic for conversational quote generation, and Google Sheets for logging and analytics.

1. Solution Overview

The workflow implements an automated car insurance quote generator that:

  • Receives quote requests through a public webhook endpoint.
  • Transforms and embeds relevant text into vector representations.
  • Persists and retrieves contextual knowledge from Pinecone.
  • Exposes the vector store to an LLM-driven Agent as a queryable tool.
  • Maintains short-term conversation context using memory.
  • Uses Anthropic as the chat model to generate natural language quotes.
  • Logs each quote attempt to Google Sheets for audit and analysis.

The result is a scalable, explainable quote generator that can be integrated into websites, CRMs, or internal tools with minimal code.

2. Target Use Case & Benefits

2.1 Why automate car insurance quotes?

Customers expect rapid, tailored responses when requesting insurance quotes. Manual handling of these requests is slow and error-prone. This n8n-based workflow automates:

  • Initial lead qualification and quote generation.
  • Context-aware policy recommendations using prior data.
  • Structured logging for compliance and performance tracking.

2.2 Key benefits

  • Scalable knowledge storage using Pinecone vector search for product and policy data.
  • Context-aware responses via embeddings, retrieval, and short-term memory.
  • Low-code orchestration with n8n for configuration, monitoring, and iteration.
  • Traceable audit logs in Google Sheets for compliance, QA, and reporting.

3. High-Level Architecture

The architecture is implemented as a single n8n workflow composed of the following logical components:

  • Inbound interface: Webhook node (HTTP POST) for quote requests.
  • Preprocessing: Text Splitter for chunking long text.
  • Vectorization: Hugging Face embeddings node.
  • Persistence: Pinecone Insert node to store vectors.
  • Retrieval: Pinecone Query node for semantic search.
  • Tool abstraction: Tool node exposing retrieval as an Agent tool.
  • Conversation state: Memory buffer node for short-term context.
  • LLM engine: Anthropic Chat node for natural language generation.
  • Orchestration logic: Agent node that coordinates tools, memory, and chat.
  • Logging: Google Sheets node to append structured quote records.

Data flows from the webhook through preprocessing, embedding, and retrieval, then into the Agent and LLM, and finally into a Sheets log. Pinecone is used both as a knowledge store and as a source of grounding context for the LLM.

4. Node-by-Node Breakdown

4.1 Webhook Node – Entry Point

Role: Accepts incoming quote requests and triggers the workflow.

Typical configuration:

  • HTTP Method: POST
  • Path: e.g. /car_insurance_quote_generator
  • Response mode: Synchronous response with the generated quote or an acknowledgment, depending on your design.

Example request payload:

{  "name": "Jane Doe",  "vehicle": { "make": "Toyota", "model": "Camry", "year": 2018 },  "drivers": [{ "age": 34, "licenseYears": 16 }],  "coverage": "full",  "notes": "commuter, 10k miles/year"
}

The Webhook node parses the JSON body and makes it available to subsequent nodes as {{$json}}. You can map specific fields (such as vehicle or notes) into later nodes for embedding and retrieval.

4.2 Text Splitter Node – Chunking Input

Role: Split long or composite text into manageable chunks before embedding.

This node is most relevant if your workflow processes:

  • Long free-form notes in the request.
  • Attached policy documents or FAQs.
  • Historical quote narratives you want to index.

Typical parameters:

  • Chunk size: e.g. 400 characters or tokens.
  • Chunk overlap: e.g. 40 to preserve context across boundaries.

Chunking helps maintain semantic coherence in embeddings while keeping vector store operations efficient. If the incoming text is already short, you can bypass or conditionally skip this node.

4.3 Hugging Face Embeddings Node – Vectorization

Role: Convert text chunks into vector embeddings suitable for semantic search.

Key configuration points:

  • Model selection: Use a sentence or document embedding model optimized for semantic similarity. Set the model name in:
    • Environment variables, or
    • n8n credentials / configuration to avoid hardcoding.
  • Input field: Map the chunked text field (output of Text Splitter) into the embeddings node.

Each input item becomes an embedding vector. These vectors, along with any metadata, are passed to the Pinecone Insert node.

4.4 Pinecone Insert Node – Persisting Vectors

Role: Store embeddings and metadata in a Pinecone index.

Typical configuration:

  • Index name: e.g. car_insurance_quote_generator.
  • Namespace: Optional, for separating environments or product lines.
  • Vector payload: Embedding array from the Hugging Face node.
  • Metadata: Useful keys can include:
    • source (e.g. “knowledge_base”, “historical_quote”).
    • customerId or an anonymized identifier.
    • timestamp for temporal filtering.
    • policyTags (e.g. “comprehensive”, “liability”, “state_CA”).

Metadata enables powerful filtering at query time, such as limiting results to a specific state, product type, or recency window.

4.5 Pinecone Query Node – Semantic Retrieval

Role: Retrieve relevant documents, prior quotes, or policy snippets to guide the quote.

On each new quote request, you typically:

  1. Build a query text from the request, such as a combination of:
    • Vehicle details.
    • Driver profile.
    • Coverage type.
    • Free-text notes.
  2. Embed this query text using the same Hugging Face model.
  3. Send the resulting embedding to Pinecone Query.

Query configuration:

  • Top K: Number of nearest neighbors to return (e.g. 5 or 10).
  • Filter: Optional JSON filter using metadata fields, for example:
    {  "policyTags": { "$in": ["comprehensive"] },  "state": "CA"
    }

The query node returns a list of matches with vectors, scores, and metadata. These results are later exposed to the LLM as a tool output.

4.6 Tool Node – Exposing Vector Search to the Agent

Role: Wrap the Pinecone retrieval as a callable tool for the Agent.

In an Agent-style architecture, tools represent external capabilities that the LLM can invoke. Here, the Tool node:

  • Takes the Pinecone Query output.
  • Defines a tool interface that the Agent can call when it needs to “look up” relevant policies or prior quotes.
  • Returns structured results that the Agent can reference when constructing the final quote.

This design ensures that the LLM is grounded in actual retrieved data rather than relying solely on its internal training.

4.7 Memory Node – Short-Term Conversation Context

Role: Maintain recent interaction history to support multi-turn conversations.

The Memory node stores:

  • Previous user messages (follow-up questions, clarifications).
  • Key decisions or selected coverage options.

Typical configuration uses a buffer that keeps the last N messages or a limited token budget. The Agent reads from and writes to this memory so that:

  • Coverage choices remain consistent across turns.
  • Additional drivers or vehicles added in follow-up messages are respected.

If you only support single-turn interactions, memory can be minimal, but retaining at least a short buffer is useful for user corrections and clarifications.

4.8 Anthropic Chat Node – Natural Language Generation

Role: Provide the LLM that generates the quote text and explanations.

Core configuration parameters:

  • Model: Anthropic chat model of your choice.
  • System / role prompt: Instructions that define:
    • Voice and tone (professional, clear, compliant).
    • Required fields in the quote.
    • Constraints on what the model should and should not say.
  • Temperature: Controls variability. Lower for more deterministic pricing explanations.
  • Max tokens / response length: To avoid overly long outputs.

The Agent directs the Anthropic node to:

  • Generate a structured quote.
  • Provide a human-readable explanation of coverage, deductibles, and exclusions.
  • List next steps for the customer or agent.

4.9 Agent Node – Orchestrating Tools, Memory, and Chat

Role: Coordinate the LLM, tools, and memory to produce the final quote.

The Agent node acts as the “brain” of the workflow. It:

  • Receives the user request and any prior conversation context from memory.
  • Decides when to call the vector search tool to retrieve relevant information.
  • Combines:
    • Webhook request data,
    • Retrieved Pinecone documents,
    • Memory state,

    and passes them to the Anthropic Chat node.

  • Produces both:
    • A structured machine-readable quote (JSON-like structure).
    • A human-friendly summary for display or email.

Prompts and tool descriptions should clearly instruct the Agent to ground its responses in retrieved evidence and avoid fabricating policy details.

4.10 Google Sheets Node – Logging and Analytics

Role: Persist a log of each quote attempt for auditing and analysis.

Typical configuration:

  • Operation: Append row.
  • Spreadsheet: Dedicated sheet for car insurance quotes.
  • Mapped columns (examples):
    • timestamp
    • requestId or webhook execution ID
    • customerName
    • vehicle (stringified make/model/year)
    • recommendedPlan
    • priceEstimate
    • followUpRequired (boolean or text)

This logging layer supports compliance, performance review, A/B testing of prompts, and manual override workflows.

5. Configuration Notes & Credentials

5.1 Credentials

  • Webhook: No external credentials, but you should secure it (see security section).
  • Hugging Face: API token configured in n8n credentials or environment variables.
  • Pinecone: API key and environment configured in n8n credentials.
  • Anthropic: API key stored securely in n8n credentials.
  • Google Sheets: OAuth or service account credentials configured in n8n.

5.2 Handling large payloads

  • Enable chunking only when needed to reduce unnecessary embedding calls.
  • Consider truncating or summarizing extremely long notes before embedding.

5.3 Error handling patterns

  • Configure retry behavior or error workflows for:
    • Transient Pinecone failures.
    • LLM timeouts or rate limits.
    • Google Sheets API errors.
  • Return a fallback response from the Webhook when critical dependencies fail, such as:
    • A generic message that the quote could not be generated automatically.
    • Instructions for manual follow-up.

6. Security, Privacy, and Compliance

Because the workflow processes personal and potentially sensitive information, security and data protection are essential.

  • Webhook security:
    • Protect the endpoint with an API key, IP allowlist, or OAuth-based authentication.
    • Ensure HTTPS is enforced for all requests.
  • Data encryption:
    • Use TLS for data in transit.
    • Rely on provider-level encryption at rest for Pinecone and Google Sheets.
  • Data minimization:
    • Avoid storing unnecessary PII in the vector store.
    • Prefer anonymized identifiers and high-level metadata in Pinecone.
  • Retention policies:
    • Define how long logs and memory buffers are stored.
    • Implement deletion or anonymization policies to comply with regulations.

7. Testing, Tuning, and Edge Cases

7.1 Initial dataset and tuning

  • Start with a small but representative dataset of quotes and policies.
  • Experiment with:
    • Different embedding models.
    • Chunk sizes and overlaps.
    • Pinecone index configuration.

7.2 Retrieval quality

  • Use Pinecone filters to constrain results by:
    • Policy type (e.g. “liability”, “comprehensive”).
    • State or jurisdiction.
    • Product line or segment.
  • Review retrieved documents to ensure they are relevant and properly grounded.

Auto-Tag WordPress Posts with AI & n8n

Auto-Tag WordPress Posts with AI & n8n

Ever finished a blog post, felt proud, hit publish… then spent 15 minutes staring at the “Tags” box wondering if “productivity”, “productivity-tips”, or “productivity-hacks” is the “right” one?

If you run a busy WordPress site, manual tagging quickly turns into a full-time hobby you did not sign up for. It is tedious, inconsistent, and suspiciously good at breaking your SEO and site navigation when you are not looking.

That is where this n8n workflow template comes in. It quietly watches for new content, sends it to OpenAI for smart tag suggestions, syncs everything with your WordPress tags via the REST API, and updates your posts – all without you lifting a finger.

In this guide, you will see what the workflow does, how it works behind the scenes, how to set it up, and a few tips so your tags stay clean, consistent, and delightfully automatic.

Why bother automating WordPress tags?

Tags are not just decoration. Good tagging quietly powers:

  • Better content discovery and recommendations
  • Stronger internal linking and topic clusters
  • Healthier long-term SEO and site structure

The problem: doing this by hand is boring, slow, and inconsistent. Different editors use different spellings, formats, and naming ideas, so your taxonomy slowly turns into a junk drawer of almost-duplicate tags.

Automating tagging with n8n and AI solves that by:

  • Saving time on every single post
  • Enforcing consistent tag formats and rules
  • Reducing human error and duplicate tags
  • Using AI to suggest contextual tags that reflect the real themes of your article, not just random keywords

In short, you get cleaner tags, better navigation, and fewer “why are there 11 versions of this tag” conversations.

What this n8n workflow template actually does

This workflow is a ready-to-use automation that connects an RSS feed, OpenAI, and your WordPress site. Here is the high-level flow:

  • It detects new content via an RSS Feed Trigger (or another trigger you choose).
  • It sends the article content to an OpenAI model and asks for 3-5 relevant tags.
  • It parses and normalizes those tags (for example, title case names and dash-case slugs).
  • It calls the WordPress REST API to fetch your existing tags.
  • It creates any missing tags in WordPress when needed.
  • It collects the correct tag IDs and updates or publishes the WordPress post with those tags attached.

Result: posts get consistent, AI-generated tags with zero manual typing, clicking, or second-guessing.

Meet the key n8n nodes (behind-the-scenes magic)

RSS Feed Trigger – your content watcher

The workflow starts with an RSS Feed Trigger that looks for new posts or articles in your feed. When something new appears, the workflow wakes up and gets to work.

If your content does not come from RSS, you can easily swap this out for:

  • a Webhook trigger
  • a Schedule trigger
  • a Manual trigger while testing

OpenAI node – the tag idea machine

Next, an OpenAI node (using a Chain LLM or Chat model) reads the article content and suggests 3-5 tags.

The prompt in the template is crafted to:

  • Return tags in a consistent format (for example, title case for display names)
  • Provide slugs in dash-case so they are easy to compare and store

This consistent formatting is important so that later steps can reliably compare suggested tags with existing WordPress tags.

Structured & auto-fixing output parsers – your JSON bodyguards

AI models occasionally get creative with formatting, which is charming for poetry and terrible for workflows.

To prevent that, the template uses:

  • Structured Output Parser to turn the model response into a clean JSON array of tags
  • Auto-fixing Output Parser to repair malformed outputs and keep the workflow stable

End result: you always get predictable, machine-friendly tag data instead of mystery strings.

GET WordPress tags and comparison logic – “do we already have this?”

Once the AI has suggested tags, the workflow calls the WordPress REST API to fetch your existing tags.

It then:

  • Normalizes slugs (for example, lowercase and dash-separated)
  • Compares the normalized AI suggestions to your current tags
  • Identifies which tags already exist and which ones are missing

This comparison step is what prevents your tag list from turning into a collection of nearly identical duplicates.

POST WordPress tags – creating missing tags

For tags that do not exist yet, the workflow uses the WordPress tags endpoint to create them.

After creating new tags, the workflow:

  • Calls the WP tags endpoint again
  • Retrieves the updated list with accurate tag IDs

Those IDs are required when you attach tags to a post, so getting them right is crucial.

Combine tag IDs and publish – the final handoff

Finally, the workflow:

  • Combines the IDs of both existing and newly created tags
  • Passes that list to the WordPress node
  • Publishes or updates the post with the correct tag IDs attached

By the time this step finishes, your post is live with smart, consistent tags and you did not have to scroll through a tag list once.

How to set up the workflow (simplified guide)

Ready to retire from manual tagging? Here is how to get the template running in your n8n instance.

  1. Clone the n8n workflow template
    Import the provided template into your n8n instance. It already includes:
    • Nodes wired up for OpenAI
    • Nodes configured for WordPress REST API calls
    • Parsing and comparison logic ready to go
  2. Configure your credentials
    In n8n, add:
    • Your OpenAI API key
    • Your WordPress credentials (application password or OAuth)

    Make sure the WordPress user has permission to:

    • Read and create tags
    • Publish or update posts
  3. Adjust the trigger for your content source
    By default, the workflow uses an RSS Feed Trigger. Point it to your own feed URL, or:
    • Swap in a webhook trigger if content comes from another system
    • Use a schedule trigger to run checks periodically
    • Use a manual trigger while experimenting
  4. Set your tag naming rules
    The template is designed with:
    • Title case for display names
    • Dash-case (kebab-case) for slugs

    If you prefer snake_case, camelCase, or another style, adjust:

    • The OpenAI prompt
    • Any transformation nodes that handle casing or slug creation

    Important: keep slug and name transformations consistent across all relevant nodes so comparisons work correctly.

  5. Test with a few posts
    Before you let it run on everything:
    • Run the workflow in test mode
    • Check which tags were created in WordPress
    • Inspect slugs and tag names
    • Verify that the correct tag IDs show up on the post

    Once you are happy with the results, you can safely let it handle your regular publishing flow.

Best practices for clean, useful tags

To keep your tag system from drifting back into chaos, these practices help a lot:

  • Normalize your casing and slug rules
    For example:
    • Display: Productivity Tips (title case)
    • Slug: productivity-tips (dash-case)

    This makes tag comparisons deterministic and easier to maintain.

  • Limit the number of tags per post
    Aim for about 3-7 tags per article. Too many tags dilute relevance and clutter your taxonomy.
  • Respect API limits
    Both WordPress and OpenAI can throttle you if you send too many requests at once. Use:
    • n8n wait nodes
    • n8n retry logic

    to keep calls rate-limited and stable.

  • Use OpenAI output parsers for strict JSON
    Configure the output to look like:
    { "tags": ["Tag One", "Tag Two"] }

    This improves reliability and makes debugging far easier.

  • Only create tags when truly needed
    Let the workflow check existing slugs first. Only run the create-tag step for missing tags to avoid duplicates and clutter.

Troubleshooting common issues

1. Tags are not matching due to case or punctuation

Symptom: You see duplicates like Productivity-Tips and productivity-tips.

Fix: Apply a consistent slug normalization function before comparisons, for example:

  • Convert to lowercase
  • Replace spaces with dashes
  • Strip extra punctuation where appropriate

2. OpenAI returns unexpected output format

Symptom: The model returns plain text, bullet points, or anything that is not valid JSON.

Fix:

  • Use the Structured Output Parser node
  • Add the Auto-fixing Output Parser node as a safety net
  • Update your prompt to explicitly say: “Respond only in valid JSON with this structure…”

3. WordPress permission errors

Symptom: Requests to create tags or update posts fail with permission-related errors.

Fix:

  • Double-check your WordPress credentials in n8n
  • Ensure the API user has edit_terms and publish_posts capabilities or equivalent
  • If using application passwords, confirm they are configured for REST access

4. Duplicate tags keep appearing

Symptom: You end up with multiple tags that look almost identical, often differing only by case or punctuation.

Fix:

  • Before creating a tag, compare normalized slugs against the full WordPress tag list
  • If duplication persists, add a final dedupe step that checks both tag names and slugs before saving

Ideas for extending the workflow

Once you are happily auto-tagging posts, you can extend the same pattern to other parts of your content strategy.

  • AI-generated categories
    Duplicate the tagging subflow and point it at the WordPress categories endpoint. Adjust logic for any differences in how categories behave vs tags.
  • AI-assisted tag descriptions
    Use the same OpenAI model to generate:
    • Short tag descriptions
    • SEO-friendly metadata for tag archive pages
  • Human-in-the-loop review
    For high-value content, insert a manual approval step so editors can:
    • Approve or tweak suggested tags
    • Reject irrelevant suggestions
  • Multi-site or multisite tagging
    Adapt the REST calls to target:
    • Multiple standalone WordPress sites
    • Multisite installations with different endpoints

Security and governance tips

Automation is great, but you still want to keep your keys and site safe.

  • Store credentials in n8n
    Put your OpenAI and WordPress credentials in n8n’s secure credentials store. Avoid hard-coding keys directly into nodes.
  • Limit WordPress API permissions
    Give the API user only what it needs, typically:
    • Tag and term-related capabilities
    • Post publishing or editing capabilities
  • Log actions for auditing
    Keep a record of:
    • Which tags were created automatically
    • Which posts were updated

    This helps if automatic tag creation affects your information architecture and you need a changelog.

Real-world impact of automated tagging

Teams that adopt this kind of workflow usually notice results quickly:

  • Publishing cycles get faster because no one is stuck in tag purgatory
  • There are fewer tag collisions and near-duplicates
  • Content becomes easier to discover and navigate
  • Large sites, like newsrooms or learning platforms, remove a major manual bottleneck

In practice, you get a cleaner taxonomy, better SEO, and happier editors who can focus on writing instead of formatting slugs.

Try the template and retire manual tagging

If you are ready to put your WordPress tagging on autopilot, the next steps are simple:

  • Import the n8n template into your instance
  • Add your OpenAI and WordPress credentials
  • Point the trigger at your content source
  • Run a few tests and tweak casing rules to your taste

Script Dialogue Analyzer with n8n, LangChain & Pinecone

Script Dialogue Analyzer with n8n, LangChain, Pinecone, Hugging Face & OpenAI

This guide describes how to implement a production-style Script Dialogue Analyzer in n8n using LangChain, Pinecone, Hugging Face embeddings, and OpenAI. The workflow ingests screenplay text via a webhook, chunks and embeds dialogue, persists vectors in Pinecone, and exposes a LangChain Agent that retrieves relevant passages and generates analytical responses. Final outputs are logged to Google Sheets for traceability.

1. Solution Overview

The Script Dialogue Analyzer is designed for users who need structured, repeatable analysis of screenplay dialogue, such as:

  • Screenwriters and story editors
  • Localization and dubbing teams
  • Script consultants and analysts
  • AI and NLP researchers working with dialogue corpora

By combining text splitting, vector embeddings, and a vector database with a large language model (LLM) agent, you can submit a script or scene and then ask natural-language questions such as:

  • “List the primary traits of ALEX based on Scene 1 dialogue.”
  • “Show lines that indicate tension between ALEX and JORDAN.”
  • “Find repeated motifs or phrases across the first three scenes.”
  • “Extract all expository lines that reveal backstory.”

The workflow performs retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) on top of your script: it searches Pinecone for relevant dialogue chunks, then lets the LLM synthesize structured, context-aware answers.

2. High-Level Architecture

The n8n workflow is organized as an end-to-end pipeline:

  • Webhook (n8n) – Receives script payloads (JSON) containing dialogue.
  • Text Splitter – Character-based splitter with overlap to maintain context across chunks.
  • Embeddings (Hugging Face) – Generates vector representations of each chunk.
  • Pinecone Insert – Stores vectors and associated metadata in the script_dialogue_analyzer index.
  • Pinecone Query + LangChain Tool – Exposes semantic search as a tool callable by the Agent.
  • Conversation Memory – Buffer window that preserves recent exchanges for multi-turn analysis.
  • Chat LLM + LangChain Agent (OpenAI) – Orchestrates tool calls and composes final responses.
  • Google Sheets – Persists queries, context, and answers for auditing and later review.

The following sections document the workflow in a reference-style format, focusing on node configuration, data flow, and integration details.

3. Data Flow & Execution Lifecycle

  1. Ingestion: A client sends a POST request to the n8n Webhook with screenplay or dialogue JSON.
  2. Preprocessing: The workflow normalizes and concatenates dialogue text, then passes it to the text splitter.
  3. Chunking: The splitter generates overlapping character-based chunks optimized for embeddings and retrieval.
  4. Embedding: Each chunk is sent to Hugging Face for embedding generation.
  5. Indexing: The resulting vectors, along with metadata (for example script title, character, scene), are inserted into Pinecone.
  6. Query Phase: When a user query arrives, the Agent uses the Pinecone Query node as a LangChain tool to retrieve relevant chunks.
  7. Reasoning: The OpenAI-backed Agent uses retrieval results plus memory to generate an analytical response.
  8. Logging: The workflow appends a record to Google Sheets containing the query, retrieved context, answer, and metadata.

4. Node-by-Node Reference

4.1 Webhook Node

Purpose: Entry point for incoming scripts or dialogue payloads.

Method: POST

Content-Type: application/json

Example payload:

{  "title": "Scene 1",  "dialogue": [  { "character": "ALEX", "line": "Where did you go?" },  { "character": "JORDAN", "line": "I had to leave. It wasn't safe." }  ]
}

Expected structure:

  • title (string) – A label for the scene or script segment.
  • dialogue (array) – Each item should include:
    • character (string) – Speaker identifier.
    • line (string) – Spoken line of dialogue.

Configuration notes:

  • Set the Webhook node to respond only to POST to avoid accidental GET triggers.
  • Validate the JSON shape downstream or in pre-processing logic if your real payloads vary.
  • Ensure the node outputs are routed directly into the text splitting stage.

Edge cases:

  • If dialogue is empty or missing, the workflow will have nothing to embed or index. In such cases, you may want to add a guard node (for example IF) to exit early or return an error response.
  • Non-UTF-8 or malformed JSON should be handled at the client or reverse proxy level, as the template expects valid JSON.

4.2 Text Splitter Node

Purpose: Chunk long scenes or scripts into manageable segments without losing conversational context.

Splitter type: Character-based text splitter

Recommended configuration (from the template):

  • chunkSize: 400
  • chunkOverlap: 40

Behavior:

  • The node concatenates dialogue lines into a single text block or processes them as configured, then slices them into overlapping character spans.
  • The 40-character overlap helps preserve context at chunk boundaries so that semantically related lines are present in multiple chunks.

Configuration notes:

  • Ensure the input field used for splitting contains plain text, not nested JSON objects.
  • Consider pre-formatting lines as "CHARACTER: line" before splitting to preserve speaker attribution inside each chunk.

Trade-offs:

  • Smaller chunkSize improves retrieval precision but may fragment dialogue sequences.
  • Larger chunkSize preserves more context but can dilute the semantic specificity of embeddings.

4.3 Hugging Face Embeddings Node

Purpose: Convert each text chunk into a vector embedding suitable for semantic search.

Model placeholder: model: default (in the template)

Recommended model examples:

  • sentence-transformers/all-MiniLM-L6-v2
  • Any other Hugging Face sentence embedding model suitable for dialogue semantics

Credentials:

  • Configure a Hugging Face API key in n8n credentials and select it in the node.

Configuration notes:

  • Map the node input to the chunk text field produced by the splitter.
  • Ensure the node returns embeddings as arrays of floats that can be consumed by the Pinecone Insert node.
  • Batching is recommended when embedding large scripts to respect rate limits and reduce overhead, where supported by your n8n version and node configuration.

Potential issues:

  • If embeddings are null or the node throws an error, verify the model name and API key.
  • Large payloads may trigger rate limits. In this case, introduce throttling or chunk your workflow execution.

4.4 Pinecone Insert Node

Purpose: Persist embeddings and metadata into a Pinecone vector index for later retrieval.

Index name: script_dialogue_analyzer

Mode: insert

Credentials:

  • Pinecone API key
  • Pinecone environment (for example us-west1-gcp, depending on your account)

Configuration notes:

  • Generate a unique ID per chunk (for example a combination of script title, scene number, and chunk index) to avoid collisions.
  • Attach metadata fields such as:
    • title (script or scene title)
    • character (if chunk is dominated by a single speaker)
    • scene_number or similar identifier
    • line_index or chunk index
  • Ensure the vector dimension in Pinecone matches the embedding dimension of your chosen Hugging Face model.

Usage pattern:

  • Each chunk from the splitter is embedded, then inserted as a separate vector record in Pinecone.
  • Metadata enables more granular filtering or precise referencing in downstream responses.

Troubleshooting:

  • If queries later return no results, confirm that vectors are actually present in the script_dialogue_analyzer index.
  • Check that the index name and environment in the Insert node match the Query node configuration.

4.5 Pinecone Query Node & LangChain Tool

Purpose: Retrieve the most relevant dialogue chunks for a given user query and expose this retrieval capability as a LangChain tool.

Behavior:

  • The node accepts a query string or embedding, performs a similarity search on the script_dialogue_analyzer index, and returns the top-k nearest vectors.
  • These results are wrapped as a LangChain tool so that the Agent can call Pinecone search as needed during reasoning.

Configuration notes:

  • Use the same Pinecone credentials and index name as in the Insert node.
  • Set an appropriate top_k value (for example 5-10) based on how much context you want the Agent to consider.
  • Ensure the node outputs include both the text payload and metadata for each match so the LLM can reference them explicitly.

Edge cases & tuning:

  • If queries feel noisy or off-topic, try lowering top_k or adjusting similarity thresholds (if available in your configuration).
  • If results are too sparse, verify that the query text is embedded using the same model or embedding configuration as the index.

4.6 Memory (Buffer Window) Node

Purpose: Maintain short-term conversational context across multiple user queries, for example iterative analysis of the same scene.

Behavior:

  • The memory node stores recent user inputs and Agent outputs in a buffer window.
  • On each new query, the Agent receives this conversation history, which helps it maintain continuity and refer back to previous findings.

Configuration notes:

  • Set a reasonable window size so that memory remains relevant without exceeding token limits.
  • Ensure the memory node is correctly wired to both read from and write to the Chat / Agent node.

4.7 Chat LLM + LangChain Agent (OpenAI)

Purpose: Act as the core reasoning engine that interprets user queries, decides whether to call the Pinecone tool, and generates human-readable analysis.

Components:

  • Chat Node (OpenAI): Provides the underlying LLM.
  • LangChain Agent: Orchestrates tool calls and composes the final answer.

Agent responsibilities:

  • Interpret user intent from natural language input.
  • Invoke the Pinecone search tool when contextual evidence is required.
  • Use conversation memory to maintain continuity across multiple queries.
  • Produce structured analyses, for example:
    • Character voice and traits
    • Sentiment and emotional tone
    • Motifs, repeated phrases, or thematic patterns
    • Suggestions for alternative lines or refinements

Credentials:

  • OpenAI API key configured in n8n and selected in the Chat node.

Configuration notes:

  • Attach the Pinecone Query node as a tool to the Agent so it can perform retrieval as needed.
  • Connect the memory node so that the Agent receives the latest conversation context.
  • Optionally, customize the system prompt to instruct the Agent to:
    • Always ground answers in retrieved dialogue chunks.
    • Quote specific lines and characters when making claims.
    • Avoid speculation beyond the retrieved evidence.

Hallucination mitigation:

  • Encourage the Agent (via prompt) to explicitly reference retrieved chunks.
  • Limit top_k or adjust retrieval parameters to prioritize highly relevant passages.

4.8 Google Sheets Logging Node

Purpose: Persist a structured log of each analysis run for auditing, review, or downstream reporting.

Target: A Google Sheet identified by SHEET_ID

Typical fields to log:

  • User query
  • Script or scene title
  • Top retrieved passages (or references to them)
  • Agent answer
  • Metadata such as:
    • Timestamp
    • Scene number
    • Character focus (if applicable)

Credentials:

  • Google Sheets OAuth2 credentials configured in n8n.

Configuration notes:

  • Use “Append” mode so each new analysis is added as a new row.
  • Align the node’s field mapping with your sheet’s column structure.
  • Consider logging only references or short excerpts of script text to reduce sensitivity and size.

5. Example Queries & Usage Patterns

Once the script is indexed, you can send natural-language questions to the Agent, which will:

  1. Interpret the query.
  2. Call Pinecone to fetch relevant chunks.
  3. Generate a synthesized, context-aware answer.

Example prompts:

  • “List the primary traits of ALEX based on Scene 1 dialogue.”
  • “Show lines that indicate tension between ALEX and JORDAN.”
  • “Find repeated motifs or phrases across the first three scenes.”
  • “Extract all expository lines that reveal backstory.”

For each query, the Agent uses Pinecone retrieval as external evidence and the LLM as a reasoning layer on top of that evidence.

6. Configuration & Optimization Guidelines

6.1 Chunking Strategy

Automate Interviews with n8n: Interview Scheduler

Automate Interviews with n8n: Interview Scheduler Template

Use this n8n Interview Scheduler workflow template to automate interview coordination, centralize candidate data, and maintain an auditable log of every interaction. The automation combines a webhook trigger, text splitting, OpenAI embeddings, a Weaviate vector database, a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) agent, and structured logging in Google Sheets, with Slack alerts for operational errors.

This reference-style guide explains the workflow architecture, each node’s role, configuration details, and how data moves through the system so you can deploy, debug, and extend the template with confidence.

1. Workflow Overview

The Interview Scheduler workflow is designed to:

  • Accept interview requests via an HTTP POST webhook.
  • Extract and split free-text content into manageable chunks.
  • Generate semantic embeddings with OpenAI and store them in Weaviate.
  • Use a RAG-style agent to interpret candidate constraints and propose next steps.
  • Persist all outcomes to Google Sheets for reporting and auditability.
  • Send Slack alerts if any error occurs during processing.

The result is a reusable, API-driven interview scheduling automation that can sit behind your forms, ATS, or custom front-end.

2. Architecture & Data Flow

The workflow is composed of the following logical stages:

  1. Webhook Trigger – Receives interview request payloads via HTTP POST.
  2. Text Splitting – Splits long notes or email threads into chunks.
  3. Embeddings (OpenAI) – Converts chunks into vector representations.
  4. Weaviate Insert – Stores embeddings into the interview_scheduler index.
  5. Weaviate Query – Retrieves contextually relevant records for the current request.
  6. Vector Tool – Exposes Weaviate query as a tool for the RAG agent.
  7. RAG Agent – Uses OpenAI Chat Model, vector tool, and window memory to generate a scheduling decision or response.
  8. Window Memory – Maintains short-term conversational state across steps.
  9. Google Sheets Append – Logs each processed request and agent status.
  10. Slack Alert (onError) – Sends notifications to a Slack channel if the workflow fails.

Data flows linearly from the webhook through embedding and retrieval into the agent, then into logging. An error branch handles failures and triggers Slack alerts.

3. Node-by-Node Breakdown

3.1 Webhook Trigger

Node type: Webhook
Purpose: Entry point for external systems to submit interview requests.

The workflow is triggered via an HTTP POST webhook named interview-scheduler. n8n exposes a unique URL for this webhook, which you can integrate with:

  • Web forms (e.g. application or scheduling forms).
  • Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) that support webhooks.
  • Custom front-ends or backend services.

Expected payload fields (example):

  • candidate_name
  • contact_info (email, phone, or both)
  • preferred_times (free text or structured JSON)
  • notes (optional, may include email threads or recruiter comments)

Configuration notes:

  • Method should be set to POST.
  • Ensure the n8n instance is accessible via a public endpoint if used from external systems.
  • Consider adding authentication or IP allowlists to restrict access to the webhook.

3.2 Text Splitter

Node type: Text Splitter
Purpose: Break long text into smaller segments suitable for embedding and retrieval.

Candidate notes or email threads can be lengthy. The Text Splitter node processes the relevant text fields and divides them into overlapping chunks, for example:

  • chunkSize = 400 characters
  • overlap = 40 characters

This configuration preserves context across boundaries and improves retrieval accuracy. Overlap ensures that important information near the end of a chunk is still visible at the beginning of the next chunk.

Edge considerations:

  • If the text is shorter than the configured chunkSize, it will pass through as a single chunk.
  • Verify that only relevant fields (for example notes or preferred_times) are passed to the splitter to avoid unnecessary token usage later.

3.3 Embeddings (OpenAI)

Node type: OpenAI Embeddings
Purpose: Transform text chunks into numerical vectors for semantic search.

The workflow uses an OpenAI embeddings model such as text-embedding-3-small to convert each text chunk into a vector. These embeddings are later stored in Weaviate and used for similarity search.

Typical configuration:

  • Model: text-embedding-3-small (or another compatible OpenAI embedding model)
  • Input: Array of chunked text from the Text Splitter node
  • Credentials: OpenAI API key configured in n8n credentials

Operational notes:

  • Monitor your OpenAI usage limits and costs, especially if processing high volumes.
  • Batching chunks into a single embeddings request where possible can reduce API overhead.
  • If the node fails, check API key validity, model name, and account rate limits.

3.4 Weaviate Insert & Query

Node types: Weaviate Insert, Weaviate Query
Purpose: Persist embeddings and retrieve relevant context for each new request.

3.4.1 Weaviate Insert

The Insert node stores each embedding vector along with its associated metadata in a Weaviate index. The template assumes an index (class) named interview_scheduler.

Key configuration elements:

  • Weaviate instance: Cloud or self-hosted, reachable from n8n.
  • Index name (class): interview_scheduler.
  • Schema: Should support fields such as text content, candidate identifiers, timestamps, and any other metadata you include.

Schema validation:

  • Ensure the schema is created in Weaviate before running the workflow.
  • Match property names in the node configuration with the Weaviate schema fields.

3.4.2 Weaviate Query

The Query node performs a similarity search against the interview_scheduler index using the current request’s embeddings. This returns the most relevant passages or records to be used as context by the RAG agent.

Usage in the workflow:

  • The query uses the embedding of the current request to retrieve similar historical notes or constraints.
  • Returned results are passed to the Vector Tool node, which exposes them to the agent.

Failure handling:

  • If the query fails, verify network connectivity to the Weaviate instance and index name spelling.
  • Check that the Weaviate API key or auth configuration is correctly set in n8n credentials.

3.5 Vector Tool & RAG Agent

3.5.1 Vector Tool

Node type: Vector Tool (LangChain-style tool wrapper)
Purpose: Wrap Weaviate query capabilities as a callable tool for the agent.

The Vector Tool node takes the Weaviate Query configuration and exposes it as a function-like tool that the agent can invoke when it needs additional context. This keeps the RAG logic modular and allows the agent to decide when to query the vector store.

3.5.2 RAG Agent

Node type: Agent (RAG / tool-using agent)
Purpose: Combine candidate data, vector store context, and a chat model to generate scheduling decisions.

The RAG Agent node uses an OpenAI Chat Model together with:

  • The Vector Tool for retrieving context from Weaviate.
  • Window Memory for short-term conversational history.

Key configuration aspects:

  • Model: An OpenAI chat model configured in n8n (for example a GPT-based model).
  • System prompt: Instructs the agent to act as an Interview Scheduler assistant, guiding it to:
    • Interpret candidate availability and constraints.
    • Identify conflicts or missing information.
    • Propose suggested interview times or next steps.
  • Tools: The Vector Tool is attached so the agent can fetch context as needed.

Output: The agent produces a structured status message that typically includes:

  • Recommended interview slots or actions.
  • Any detected conflicts or issues.
  • Summary notes for logging.

Prompt design tips:

  • Define a clear output format (for example JSON fields or bullet points) to simplify downstream parsing and logging.
  • Explicitly instruct the agent on how to handle ambiguous or incomplete availability information.

3.6 Window Memory

Node type: Window Memory
Purpose: Maintain a limited sliding window of conversation history for the agent.

Window Memory stores the most recent messages in the interaction so the agent can maintain context across multiple steps. This is particularly useful for:

  • Follow-up questions about availability.
  • Clarifications on constraints or preferences.
  • Multi-turn interactions where the agent refines its suggestion.

Configuration note: The memory window size should be set to a reasonable number of turns to balance context retention with token usage and performance.

3.7 Append to Google Sheets

Node type: Google Sheets – Append
Purpose: Persist a log of each processed request and the agent result.

After the RAG Agent generates the final status, the workflow appends a new row to a Google Sheet. This sheet acts as a single source of truth and an audit log for interview scheduling operations.

Typical configuration:

  • Spreadsheet ID: The target Google Sheets document ID (SHEET_ID).
  • Sheet name: Log.

Example fields to log:

  • Timestamp of processing.
  • Candidate name.
  • Parsed availability or requested time slots.
  • Agent decision or status message.
  • Any error flags or notes.

Access control: Ensure the Google Sheets credentials used in n8n have write access to the specified spreadsheet and sheet.

3.8 Slack Alerts (Error Handling)

Node type: Slack – Send Message
Purpose: Notify the team when the workflow encounters an error.

The workflow includes an onError branch. If any upstream node fails (for example OpenAI, Weaviate, or Sheets), this branch sends a Slack alert to a configured channel such as #alerts.

Alert content (typical):

  • Error message or stack trace (as available in n8n error data).
  • Context about which node failed.
  • Optional reference to the candidate or request ID if available.

Slack configuration:

  • Slack app or bot token configured as credentials in n8n.
  • Channel ID or name set in the node parameters (for example #alerts).

4. Configuration & Deployment Checklist

Before enabling the Interview Scheduler in production, verify the following:

  • n8n instance
    • Hosted or self-hosted with a stable, public URL for the webhook.
    • Environment variables and credentials stored securely in n8n.
  • OpenAI
    • OpenAI account with a valid API key.
    • OpenAI credentials configured in n8n.
    • Embedding model (for example text-embedding-3-small) and chat model available in your account.
  • Weaviate
    • Cloud or self-hosted Weaviate instance reachable from n8n.
    • Schema defined with an index (class) named interview_scheduler.
    • Authentication and TLS configured according to your environment.
  • Google Sheets
    • Service account or OAuth credentials configured in n8n.
    • Target spreadsheet ID (SHEET_ID) accessible by those credentials.
    • Sheet named Log created in the spreadsheet.
  • Slack
    • Slack app or bot with permission to post messages.
    • Slack credentials configured in n8n.
    • Alert channel (for example #alerts) specified in the node.

5. Best Practices for Reliability & Cost Control

  • Secure the webhook
    • Use authentication headers, tokens, or IP allowlists to prevent unauthorized requests.
  • Optimize text chunking
    • Use chunk overlaps (for example 40 characters) to maintain context between chunks.
    • Avoid embedding unnecessary fields to reduce token usage.
  • Control embedding costs
    • Monitor embedding volume and costs in OpenAI dashboards.
    • Batch chunks where possible to reduce API overhead.
  • Design robust prompts
    • Provide a clear system message describing the agent’s role as an Interview Scheduler.
    • Specify the expected output structure to make downstream parsing and logging easier.
  • Minimize sensitive data in vectors
    • Store only the necessary personal data in Weaviate.
    • Use hashed identifiers where possible to align with privacy policies.

6. Security & Privacy Considerations

Interview workflows often handle personal and potentially sensitive information. Ensure that your implementation aligns with your organization’s security and compliance requirements.

  • Encryption
    • Use TLS for all connections to Weaviate and Google Sheets.
    • Ensure n8n itself is served over HTTPS.
  • Access control
    • Restrict access to the Google Sheet and Weaviate index to necessary service accounts only.
    • Limit who can view the n

Automate Calendar to ClickUp with n8n & LangChain

Automate Calendar to ClickUp with n8n & LangChain

What You Will Learn

In this tutorial, you will learn how to build an automated “Calendar to ClickUp” workflow in n8n that:

  • Receives calendar events through a webhook
  • Splits and embeds event descriptions using LangChain and OpenAI
  • Stores and retrieves context with Pinecone vector storage
  • Uses a RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) agent to generate structured ClickUp tasks
  • Logs results to Google Sheets and sends Slack alerts when something goes wrong

The goal is to turn raw calendar data into reliable, structured ClickUp tasks with as little manual work as possible.

Why Automate Calendar Events Into ClickUp?

Manually turning meetings and calendar events into ClickUp tasks is:

  • Time-consuming
  • Prone to copy-paste errors
  • Inconsistent across team members

By combining n8n, LangChain, Pinecone, and OpenAI, you can build a workflow that:

  • Ingests calendar data via a webhook in real time
  • Understands event descriptions using text embeddings
  • Retrieves related context from previous meetings
  • Generates structured task fields ready for ClickUp
  • Logs all activity and alerts you on failures

This approach is especially useful when your event descriptions contain rich notes, action items, or follow-ups that you do not want to lose.

Key Concepts Before You Start

n8n Workflow Basics

n8n is a workflow automation tool where you connect nodes to process data step by step. In this workflow you will use nodes for:

  • Webhook Trigger to receive events
  • Text processing and embeddings
  • Pinecone for vector storage and search
  • RAG Agent for task generation
  • Google Sheets and Slack for logging and alerts

Text Splitting and Embeddings

Long event descriptions are split into smaller chunks so that:

  • Embeddings can capture meaning more accurately
  • Vector search can find the most relevant pieces later

Embeddings are numerical representations of text. In this workflow, OpenAI’s text-embedding-3-small model turns chunks of event text into vectors that can be stored and searched in Pinecone.

Pinecone and RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation)

Pinecone is a vector database. You will:

  • Insert embeddings into a Pinecone index named calendar_to_clickup
  • Query that index to retrieve similar or related content for a new event

RAG combines that retrieved context with the current event to guide a chat model. Instead of the model guessing from scratch, it uses relevant past information to generate more accurate ClickUp task details.

Workflow Architecture Overview

The template workflow in n8n is built from these main components:

  • Webhook Trigger: Receives calendar payloads at POST path calendar-to-clickup
  • Text Splitter: Splits long descriptions into chunks (size 400, overlap 40)
  • OpenAI Embeddings: Uses model text-embedding-3-small
  • Pinecone Insert and Pinecone Query: Store and query vectors in index calendar_to_clickup
  • Vector Tool and Window Memory: Provide retrieved context to the RAG Agent and maintain conversation context
  • Chat Model + RAG Agent: Converts event data into ClickUp-ready task fields
  • Google Sheets Append: Logs RAG outputs to a sheet named Log
  • Slack Alert: Sends error notifications to a channel (for example, #alerts) using an onError path

Step-by-Step: Building the Calendar to ClickUp Workflow in n8n

Step 1: Create the Webhook Trigger

  1. Add a Webhook Trigger node in n8n.
  2. Set the HTTP method to POST.
  3. Set the path to calendar-to-clickup.
  4. Copy the webhook URL and configure your calendar integration or middleware to send event payloads to this URL.

Once configured, every time a calendar event is created or updated (depending on your calendar setup), the payload will be sent to this webhook and will start the n8n workflow.

Step 2: Normalize and Split the Event Description

  1. Add a Text Splitter node after the Webhook Trigger.
  2. Use the Character Text Splitter type.
  3. Configure:
    • chunkSize: 400
    • chunkOverlap: 40
  4. Map the calendar event description field from the webhook JSON into the Text Splitter input.

These settings keep enough overlap between chunks so that context is not lost at the boundaries. This improves both embedding quality and later retrieval accuracy.

Step 3: Generate OpenAI Embeddings

  1. Add a LangChain OpenAI Embeddings node.
  2. Select the model text-embedding-3-small.
  3. Feed the text chunks from the Text Splitter node into this embeddings node.

The output of this node will be dense vectors that represent the meaning of each text chunk. These vectors are what you will store in Pinecone.

Step 4: Store Embeddings in Pinecone

  1. Add a Pinecone Insert node.
  2. Point it to a Pinecone index named calendar_to_clickup (create this index in Pinecone if you have not already).
  3. Map the embeddings and any relevant metadata (such as event ID, title, or timestamp) from the previous node into the insert operation.

By indexing embeddings, you can later enrich new events with related historical context, such as previous meetings with the same client or earlier sessions of a recurring project.

Step 5: Retrieve Context with Pinecone Query, Vector Tool, and Window Memory

When a new event is processed, you want to bring in relevant past information.

  1. Add a Pinecone Query node that:
    • Queries the calendar_to_clickup index
    • Uses the embedding of the current event as the query vector
  2. Add a Vector Tool node to expose the retrieved vectors and their metadata to the RAG Agent.
  3. Add a Window Memory node so that the agent can keep track of ongoing context across steps in the RAG flow.

Together, these nodes give the RAG Agent both the current event and any similar or related past content to work with.

Step 6: Configure the RAG Agent to Create ClickUp Task Fields

  1. Add a Chat Model node configured with your OpenAI chat model of choice.
  2. Add a RAG Agent node and connect:
    • The Chat Model
    • The Vector Tool output
    • The Window Memory
  3. Set the RAG Agent system message to:
    You are an assistant for Calendar to ClickUp.
  4. Set the prompt type to define.
  5. Feed both the raw calendar event JSON and the retrieved context into the agent.

The RAG Agent should output a structured representation of the ClickUp task, including fields such as:

  • Task title
  • Description
  • Due date
  • Assignees
  • Priority
  • Tags or custom fields required by your ClickUp workspace

Example Prompt to the RAG Agent

Here is a sample prompt structure you can use for the agent:

{  "system": "You are an assistant for Calendar to ClickUp.",  "user": "Process the following data for task 'Calendar to ClickUp':\n\n{{ $json }}"
}

In n8n, {{ $json }} is typically replaced with the current item’s JSON data from the workflow.

Step 7: Log the Output and Prepare for ClickUp Task Creation

  1. Add a Google Sheets Append node.
  2. Connect it after the RAG Agent node.
  3. Configure it to:
    • Use your chosen spreadsheet
    • Append to a sheet named Log
  4. Map the RAG Agent output fields into columns in the Log sheet.

This gives you a simple audit trail of what the agent produced for each event.

After logging, you can add a ClickUp API node (or a generic HTTP Request node) to actually create tasks in ClickUp using the structured output from the agent. The template focuses on logging, but it is designed so you can easily add your ClickUp creation logic using your ClickUp API key and workspace configuration.

Error Handling with Slack Alerts

To avoid silent failures, the workflow includes a dedicated error path.

  • The RAG Agent node has an onError connection to a Slack Alert node.
  • When the agent fails, the Slack node posts a message to a channel such as #alerts.
  • The message contains error details, so your team can quickly investigate webhook issues, model errors, or data problems.

Make sure the Slack node is configured with the correct workspace, channel, and authentication so that alerts always reach the right people.

Best Practices for a Reliable Workflow

  • Security: Protect your webhook with a secret token, IP allowlist, or other access controls to prevent unauthorized requests.
  • Rate limits: Monitor your OpenAI and Pinecone usage. Use batching where possible to reduce the number of requests and avoid throttling.
  • Chunking strategy: The default chunkSize of 400 and chunkOverlap of 40 work well for many event descriptions, but you can adjust them based on typical description length and complexity.
  • Schema enforcement: In the RAG Agent prompt, require a strict output format such as JSON or TSV. This makes downstream ClickUp API calls predictable and easier to validate.
  • Monitoring: Log both inputs and outputs in Google Sheets or a database. This helps with debugging, audits, and improving your prompts over time.

Testing Checklist

Before using this in production, run through the following tests:

  • Send sample calendar events of different sizes and complexity to the webhook.
  • Confirm that embeddings are generated and stored correctly in the calendar_to_clickup Pinecone index.
  • Check that the RAG Agent output strictly follows the expected schema and includes all required ClickUp fields.
  • Verify that logs appear in the Log sheet in Google Sheets.
  • Ensure Slack alerts only trigger on real errors, not on successful runs.

Cost and Performance Considerations

Several components in this workflow have usage-based costs:

  • OpenAI embeddings: Costs depend on the number of tokens you embed. Using text-embedding-3-small is cost-effective for bulk ingestion.
  • Chat model: More powerful models are more expensive but may handle complex reasoning better. You can reserve them for the RAG Agent and keep embeddings on the smaller model.
  • Pinecone storage: Costs scale with the number of vectors and the index configuration. Consider deleting or archiving outdated vectors to control storage usage.

Monitoring usage and adjusting chunk size, frequency of ingestion, and retention policies can help optimize both cost and performance.

Ideas for Extending the Pipeline

Once the basic “Calendar to ClickUp” flow is stable, you can build more advanced features:

  • Bidirectional sync: Add a ClickUp to Calendar workflow so that changes in tasks (status, due date, etc.) are reflected back in calendar events.
  • Advanced matching: Use Pinecone to suggest similar past tasks so you can reuse templates, assignees, or tags.
  • Custom field mapping: Map calendar metadata (such as organizer, location, or meeting type) to ClickUp custom fields based on the calendar source.
  • Approval UI: Insert a lightweight approval step, for example a Slack message with interactive buttons, before creating high-impact tasks automatically.

Quick FAQ

Do I have to use Pinecone?

Pinecone is used for scalable and efficient vector search. If you want retrieval-augmented generation with historical context, you need some form of vector storage. Pinecone is a good managed option for this template.

Can I change the embedding model?

Yes. The template uses text-embedding-3-small for cost-effective bulk ingestion, but you can choose another OpenAI embedding model if you need different performance or accuracy characteristics.

How do I actually create the ClickUp task?

The template focuses on generating structured task data and logging it. To create tasks, add a ClickUp API node (or HTTP Request node) after the logging step, map the RAG Agent output to ClickUp’s task fields, and authenticate with your ClickUp API key.

Is the RAG Agent output format fixed?

No, but it should be clearly defined. In your system messages and prompts, specify the exact JSON or TSV schema you expect so that downstream nodes can parse it reliably.

Recap and Next Steps

You have seen how to build an n8n workflow that:

  • Receives calendar events via a webhook
  • Splits and embeds descriptions using LangChain and OpenAI
  • Stores and retrieves context with a Pinecone index
  • Uses a RAG Agent to transform events into structured ClickUp tasks
  • Logs results to Google Sheets and sends Slack alerts on errors

To move forward:

  1. Deploy the webhook and confirm calendar events are reaching n8n.
  2. Build and test the embedding and Pinecone indexing steps.
  3. Iterate on your RAG Agent prompts and output schema until the ClickUp fields are reliable.
  4. Add and configure the ClickUp API node to create tasks automatically.
  5. Share the workflow with your team and refine it based on feedback.

Call to action: Try this template in your n8n workspace, experiment with different chunk sizes and prompt formats, and then connect it to ClickUp so tasks are created without manual effort. If you need help customizing the RAG prompts or mapping to your specific ClickUp fields, collaborate with your team or automation specialist

Automate Blog Content with GPT-4 & Perplexity

Automate Blog Content Creation with GPT-4, Perplexity & WordPress

Publishing great blog content on a regular basis is tough, right? Brainstorming topics, doing research, drafting, editing, formatting for WordPress, then telling everyone it is live – it all adds up.

The good news is that you can automate a huge chunk of this workflow without sacrificing quality. By combining GPT-4, Perplexity, n8n, and WordPress, you can build a content engine that handles research, writing, publishing, and notifications for you.

In this guide, we will walk through an n8n workflow template that does exactly that. You will see how Perplexity handles research, GPT-4 turns that into SEO-friendly blog posts, n8n glues everything together, and Slack, Gmail, and Notion keep your team in the loop.

Why bother automating blog content at all?

If you are publishing regularly, you have probably felt the strain of keeping up. Automation helps you:

  • Publish more often without burning out your team.
  • Keep a consistent structure, tone, and SEO approach across posts.
  • Pull in up-to-date research so your content does not feel stale.
  • Push posts straight to WordPress with the right metadata and formatting.
  • Automatically notify your team and log everything for future audits.

In other words, you still control the strategy and voice, but the repetitive parts – research, drafting, formatting, and notifications – run on autopilot.

What this n8n workflow template actually does

Let us zoom out for a second. At a high level, the template takes a topic or question and turns it into a published WordPress article, then pings your team and logs the details.

Here is the journey, end to end:

  1. You submit a topic, target keywords, and desired length.
  2. Perplexity runs live research and returns a summary with citations.
  3. n8n cleans and structures that research for GPT-4.
  4. GPT-4 writes an SEO-optimized article with headings, meta description, and HTML.
  5. The post is sent to WordPress as a draft or published post.
  6. Slack, Gmail, and Notion updates keep everyone informed and create an audit trail.

The beauty of using n8n is that you can customize each step, add checks, and keep a human in the loop wherever you want.

The main building blocks of the workflow

Perplexity for research

Perplexity is your research assistant. It pulls together search-aware summaries with links to sources so you are not guessing whether the information is current or credible.

In this workflow, Perplexity is used to:

  • Gather fresh facts, stats, and examples for your topic.
  • Provide citations you can link to in your article.
  • Reduce the chance of hallucinations in your final content.

Automating this step means every post starts from a solid, up-to-date research base instead of random guesses.

GPT-4 for drafting and SEO optimization

Once Perplexity has done the research, GPT-4 steps in as your SEO content writer.

With the right prompt, GPT-4 can:

  • Turn research into a structured blog post with H1, H2, and H3 headings.
  • Generate a compelling meta description.
  • Write in HTML or Markdown so it is ready for WordPress.
  • Include target keywords naturally, not in a spammy way.

The key is to give GPT-4 clear instructions in your n8n node: tone, length, keywords, internal linking ideas, and any calls to action you want at the end.

Example prompt snippet:
"You are an SEO content writer. Using the research below, write a 1,200-word blog post with H1, H2s, and H3s, include the keywords: 'automate blog content', 'GPT-4', 'Perplexity', and 'WordPress'. Add a 140-character meta description and a closing CTA."

n8n as the automation backbone

n8n is where everything comes together. Think of it as the conductor for your content pipeline.

In this template, n8n is responsible for:

  • Triggering the workflow from a form or chat submission.
  • Sending the topic to Perplexity and capturing the response.
  • Formatting the research into a clean structure for GPT-4.
  • Calling GPT-4 and receiving the finished article and meta fields.
  • Pushing the result to WordPress.
  • Sending notifications and logging records in Notion.

You can also add conditional logic, retries, and error handling so the workflow is stable enough to run in the background without babysitting.

WordPress for publishing

Once GPT-4 has created the article, the WordPress node in n8n handles the publishing side.

It can:

  • Create a new post with the generated title and HTML body.
  • Set categories, tags, and SEO metadata.
  • Attach or select a featured image based on the topic.
  • Save as a draft for review or publish immediately.

This is where you decide how hands-off you want to be. Many teams start with drafts, then move to auto-publish once they trust the pipeline.

Slack, Gmail, and Notion for notifications and logging

After a post is created, the workflow does not just stop. It also keeps your team informed and your records tidy.

The template uses:

  • Slack to ping an editorial or marketing channel when a new post is ready or published.
  • Gmail to email stakeholders who prefer updates in their inbox.
  • Notion to log each article with title, summary, URL, and status for future reference and audits.

This gives you visibility across the whole process and a history you can always come back to.

How the step-by-step n8n workflow runs

Let us walk through the actual flow as it appears in n8n, from the first trigger to the final notification.

Step 1 – Capture a topic or question

The workflow starts with a simple input, often from a form or chat interface. You provide:

  • The main topic or question.
  • Target keywords you want to rank for.
  • Preferred length or depth of the article.

n8n uses this information as the query sent to Perplexity.

Step 2 – Run automated research with Perplexity

Next, n8n calls the Perplexity API using that topic and context. Perplexity returns:

  • A summarized overview of the topic.
  • Key points and arguments.
  • Citations and links to authoritative sources.
  • Relevant statistics or data where available.

All of this is captured as structured data inside n8n so it can be reused in later steps.

Step 3 – Clean and format the research output

Perplexity’s response is useful, but you usually do not want to feed it to GPT-4 as-is. The workflow includes a formatter node that:

  • Extracts bullet points and key ideas.
  • Pulls out the list of sources and citations.
  • Normalizes any suggested keywords or subtopics.

This gives GPT-4 a neat, structured context so it can write with better attribution and clarity.

Step 4 – Generate SEO content with GPT-4

Now GPT-4 takes over. Using the formatted research and your instructions, it creates:

  • An H1 blog title.
  • A logical H2 and H3 outline.
  • The full body content in HTML or Markdown.
  • A short, optimized meta description.

You can also include instructions for:

  • Reading level and tone of voice.
  • Specific keywords to include.
  • Internal linking suggestions.
  • A closing call to action.

If you want a human in the loop, you can configure the workflow so the content lands in WordPress as a draft first, then your editor reviews and publishes.

Step 5 – Publish (or draft) in WordPress

Once GPT-4 returns the content, the WordPress node pushes it to your site. In this step you can:

  • Map the GPT-4 title to the WordPress post title.
  • Insert the HTML into the main content field.
  • Set tags, categories, and SEO meta fields.
  • Attach a featured image, either generated or chosen from your media library.
  • Choose whether to set the post status as draft or publish.

Step 6 – Notify your team and log the article

After WordPress confirms the post creation, the final part of the workflow kicks in:

  • Slack notification to share the title and URL in your chosen channel.
  • Gmail email to relevant stakeholders with a brief summary and link.
  • Notion entry that stores the title, summary, URL, and status for tracking and audits.

This makes your content pipeline transparent and keeps everyone aligned without manual updates.

SEO and editorial best practices for automated content

Automation is powerful, but it does not replace a solid content strategy. To keep your automated posts ranking well and aligned with your brand, keep these practices in mind:

  • Always include citations and link out to the authoritative sources Perplexity provides.
  • Use human review for sensitive topics like legal, medical, or compliance-heavy content.
  • Focus on natural language and user intent rather than stuffing keywords.
  • Include internal links to your evergreen or cornerstone content to strengthen your site structure.
  • Add a clear meta description and use structured data (schema.org) when appropriate.

Monitoring performance and keeping quality high

Once your workflow is running, you will want to keep an eye on how the content performs and tweak as you go.

Some useful KPIs to track:

  • Organic search traffic to automated posts.
  • Bounce rate and time on page.
  • Click-through rate from search results (influenced by titles and meta descriptions).

You can also:

  • Run A/B tests on headlines and CTAs to see what resonates.
  • Adjust your GPT-4 prompts based on what performs best.
  • Add an automated QA step in n8n that checks for minimum word count, presence of key phrases, and a meta description before publishing.

Common pitfalls to watch out for

Like any automation, there are a few traps you will want to avoid. Here are some of the big ones and how to handle them:

  • Stale research: For time-sensitive topics, configure Perplexity to pull fresh results or schedule periodic rechecks and content updates.
  • Over-automation: Keep a human editor in the loop for brand voice, sensitive themes, or high-impact content.
  • Plagiarism risk: Rely on Perplexity’s citations and prompt GPT-4 to paraphrase, synthesize, and add original commentary instead of copying.
  • Broken workflows: Add retry logic and error handlers in n8n, and send failure alerts to Slack or email so you can fix issues quickly.

Inside the example n8n flow: key nodes

The template shown in the visual diagram maps neatly to the steps we have covered. Some of the most important nodes are:

  • Form trigger: Collects the initial topic or question, plus any extra parameters like keywords or length.
  • Perplexity node: Calls the Perplexity API and returns research summaries and citations.
  • Formatter node: Cleans and structures the research so GPT-4 gets a clear, well-organized context.
  • GPT-4 node: Generates the full SEO-optimized article, including headings and meta description.
  • WordPress node: Creates or updates the post with the right content and metadata.
  • Gmail, Slack, and Notion nodes: Handle notifications and logging once the article is created.

Scaling your automated content production

Once you have the basic workflow running smoothly, you can start thinking about scale. Here are a few ideas:

  • Create reusable prompt templates and content briefs so every article follows a consistent tone and structure.
  • Use metadata-driven publishing, like categories, tags, and featured images, to keep your content library organized.
  • Automate internal link insertion to your cornerstone or cluster content for stronger SEO.
  • Batch your work: queue multiple topics or research queries, then have GPT-4 generate drafts on a schedule for steady publishing.

Bringing it all together

When you connect Perplexity’s research, GPT-4’s writing capabilities, n8n’s orchestration, and WordPress publishing, you end up with a powerful, repeatable system to automate blog content creation.

The payoff is clear:

  • Higher publishing velocity without extra headcount.
  • More consistent SEO signals across your posts.
  • Less manual copy-pasting and status chasing, thanks to Slack, Gmail, and Notion integrations.

If you are just getting started, you do not need to automate everything on day one. Begin with research and draft generation, then gradually plug in WordPress publishing and notifications. Over time, you can add QA checks and human review points until you hit the right balance between speed and control.

Call to action: Want a ready-made n8n workflow to do all this for you? Use the template to get your first automated article live in under 24 hours, or book a walkthrough with our automation team if you would like a guided setup. Get the template & schedule a demo.


Keywords: automate blog content, GPT-4, Perplexity, WordPress, n8n workflow, AI content automation, SEO.

Automate Instagram Scheduling from Airtable

Automate Instagram Scheduling from Airtable

Keeping a consistent Instagram presence can feel like a full-time job. Ideas live in Airtable, images sit in folders, and publishing dates are scattered across calendars. As your team and content grow, the simple act of “getting posts out” can start to drain your focus and creativity.

It does not have to stay that way. With the right workflow, your content pipeline can move from manual juggling to a calm, predictable system that runs in the background. In this guide, you will walk through an n8n workflow template that turns Airtable rows into scheduled Instagram posts, complete with smart context, safety checks, and clear logging.

This template uses text splitting, OpenAI embeddings, a Pinecone vector store, RAG (retrieval-augmented generation) tooling, and straightforward alerts to Google Sheets and Slack. Think of it as your first step toward a more automated, focused, and scalable content operation.

The problem: manual Instagram scheduling slows you down

For many teams, Airtable is already the brain of their content system. Captions, assets, publish dates, tags, and status flags all live there. Yet the last mile – actually scheduling posts – often remains manual. Someone has to copy captions, double check dates, look for duplicates, and push everything into a scheduler or API.

That manual work costs more than time. It invites errors, breaks your flow, and makes it harder to scale your content output. When you are stuck in repetitive tasks, you have less energy for strategy, creativity, and experimentation.

The possibility: a smarter, calmer content pipeline

Automation with n8n lets you turn Airtable into a true command center for Instagram. By combining n8n with embeddings and a vector store, you unlock a more intelligent workflow that can:

  • Reduce manual scheduling to a single action in Airtable, like setting a record to “Ready to Schedule”.
  • Spot near-duplicate captions before they go live so your feed stays fresh.
  • Use contextual retrieval to refine captions in line with your brand voice.
  • Log every attempt and error so you always know what happened and why.

Instead of worrying about “Did that post go out?” you can trust the system and focus on higher value work. This template is designed as a practical, realistic step toward that kind of workflow.

Mindset shift: from one-off tasks to reusable systems

Building this n8n workflow is more than a technical exercise. It is a mindset shift from repeatedly doing the same tasks to designing a system that does them for you. Each node you connect, each check you add, becomes a reusable asset for your team.

You do not need to automate everything at once. Start with a simple path from Airtable to a log, then layer in intelligence, approvals, and direct posting. As you gain confidence, you will see more opportunities to remove friction and reclaim time.

The n8n workflow template at a glance

The n8n template organizes your Instagram scheduling flow into clear, modular stages. Here is an overview of the main nodes and what they handle:

  • Webhook Trigger – Receives a POST request from Airtable or a scheduler.
  • Text Splitter – Breaks long captions into smaller chunks.
  • Embeddings (OpenAI) – Converts each text chunk into vector embeddings.
  • Pinecone Insert – Stores embeddings in a Pinecone index for future retrieval.
  • Pinecone Query + Vector Tool – Finds related content to provide context for caption evaluation and generation.
  • Window Memory & Chat Model (Anthropic) – Supplies short-term context to the RAG Agent.
  • RAG Agent – Uses the vector tool and language model to decide what to do next, such as refining captions or flagging issues.
  • Append Sheet – Logs outcomes into Google Sheets for tracking and audits.
  • Slack Alert – Sends alerts when something goes wrong so your team can act quickly.

Each of these stages is configurable, so you can adapt the workflow to your brand, team structure, and publishing tools.

From Airtable row to scheduled post: the journey

Step 1: Triggering the workflow from Airtable

The journey starts in Airtable, where your team already manages content. Use Airtable Automations or a third-party integration to send a POST request to your n8n Webhook Trigger whenever a record is marked as “Ready to Schedule”.

The webhook payload should include all the details needed to schedule a post:

  • recordId – The Airtable record id for traceability.
  • caption – The main text for the Instagram post.
  • imageUrl – A URL to the image asset.
  • publishAt – The desired publish date and time in ISO format.
  • Optional metadata such as tags or campaign info.

This single event in Airtable becomes the starting point for your entire automated scheduling flow.

Sample webhook payload

When you connect Airtable to the n8n webhook, your JSON payload might look like this:

{  "recordId": "rec123456",  "caption": "Launch week: behind the scenes of our new product...",  "imageUrl": "https://cdn.example.com/images/post1.jpg",  "publishAt": "2025-09-15T14:00:00Z",  "tags": ["launch","product"]
}

Use this structure as a reference when setting up your Airtable Automation.

Step 2: Cleaning and splitting the caption text

Once the webhook fires, the Text Splitter node prepares your caption for embedding. Long captions or multi-section notes are split into manageable chunks so that embedding models stay within token limits and retrieval stays accurate.

The template typically uses:

  • Chunk size of about 400 characters.
  • Overlap of about 40 characters between chunks.

This approach keeps related ideas together and improves the quality of later vector searches.

Step 3: Creating embeddings and storing them in Pinecone

Next, each text chunk is sent to an OpenAI embedding model such as text-embedding-3-small. The Embeddings (OpenAI) node converts each chunk into a numeric vector representation.

The Pinecone Insert node then stores these embeddings in your Pinecone index. Indexing your captions enables powerful use cases:

  • Searching for similar or duplicate captions.
  • Seeding a RAG process with relevant past content.
  • Building a memory of what you have previously published.

Over time, this index becomes a living library of your content, ready to support smarter decisions.

Step 4: Using vector search for context and quality

When the workflow evaluates or generates a caption, the Pinecone Query node retrieves related vectors from your index. The Vector Tool then passes these to your language model as contextual information.

This contextual retrieval helps you:

  • Avoid near-duplicate captions that might make your feed feel repetitive.
  • Leverage previously successful caption patterns for A/B testing and inspiration.
  • Preserve your brand voice by grounding new suggestions in past content.

Instead of writing in isolation, your model writes with awareness of your history.

Step 5: RAG Agent – decide, refine, and route

The heart of this workflow is the RAG Agent node. It combines three key ingredients:

  • Retrieved vectors from Pinecone via the Vector Tool.
  • Short-term context from Window Memory.
  • A chat model such as Anthropic (or another LLM you configure).

Using these, the RAG Agent can decide what to do with each incoming record. Typical outputs include:

  • A final, refined caption or a newly generated one based on your input.
  • Scheduling instructions such as date, time, and timezone.
  • Status flags like Scheduled, Needs Approval, or Duplicate Found.

This is where your workflow starts to feel truly intelligent, not just automated. You can adjust prompts and logic to align with your brand standards and review process.

Step 6: Logging outcomes and surfacing issues

Once the agent decides on the next action, the workflow records what happened. The Append Sheet node writes a new row to a Google Sheet with key details, such as:

  • Airtable record id.
  • Final caption.
  • Scheduled time.
  • Status and any notes.

This creates a simple audit trail and a central place to review scheduling activity.

If something goes wrong, the Slack Alert node steps in. Issues like permission errors, missing images, or detected duplicates can trigger a message to a channel such as #alerts. Your team gets immediate visibility so they can correct problems before they impact your posting schedule.

Setup checklist: get your first automation live

To turn this template into a working system, walk through the following checklist:

  • Create or access an n8n instance, either self-hosted or on n8n cloud.
  • Set up required API credentials in n8n:
    • OpenAI for embeddings.
    • Pinecone for vector storage and search.
    • Anthropic (optional) or another LLM provider for the chat model.
    • Google Sheets OAuth for logging.
    • Slack for alerts.
  • Create and configure a Pinecone index named schedule_instagram_content_from_airtable or similar.
  • Configure Airtable Automations to POST to the n8n Webhook Trigger when a record is marked as “Ready”.
  • Run a test with a sample Airtable row to confirm:
    • Text splitting works as expected.
    • Embeddings are created and inserted into Pinecone.
  • Validate the RAG Agent outputs. Check that captions, statuses, and decisions match your expectations.
  • Finally, connect the workflow to your chosen scheduler or Instagram posting service such as Buffer, Hootsuite, or the Meta Graph API.

Once this is in place, your first automated posts can move from Airtable to your scheduler with minimal manual effort.

Growing with your needs: extending the workflow

As your content strategy matures, this n8n template can evolve with you. Here are some ways to extend it:

  • Add an approval step Route agent-generated captions to Slack or back into Airtable for manual review before scheduling. This is ideal if you want automation plus human oversight.
  • Integrate image moderation Connect an image moderation API to check for policy or brand issues before a post is approved.
  • Publish directly Use the Meta Graph API or scheduling services like Buffer and Hootsuite to publish directly from your workflow, while respecting posting windows and rate limits.
  • Close the loop with analytics After posts go live, pull engagement metrics back into your system, store them in Pinecone, and teach the RAG Agent to favor high performing caption patterns.

Each enhancement turns your scheduling flow into a more complete content engine that learns and improves over time.

Troubleshooting and fine tuning

As you experiment, you might hit a few bumps. Here are practical tips to keep things running smoothly:

  • If embeddings hit token limits, reduce the chunk size in the Text Splitter or switch to a different embedding model.
  • If you see connection errors with Pinecone, verify that your index name, API key, and region are correct.
  • If the RAG Agent produces irrelevant or off brand suggestions, try:
    • Increasing the number of retrieved vectors.
    • Improving the system message or context in Window Memory.
  • Use the Slack Alert node to surface uncaught errors so you can refine the workflow quickly.

Treat these adjustments as part of the journey. Each improvement makes your automation more reliable and aligned with your goals.

Security, compliance, and responsible automation

As you automate more of your publishing process, keep security and compliance in focus:

  • Store all API keys in n8n credentials and restrict who can edit the workflow.
  • If you process user-generated content or PII, add moderation steps and define data retention policies for Pinecone vectors.
  • Follow Instagram and Meta API terms when automating posting or scheduling.

Responsible automation protects your audience, your brand, and your team.

Conclusion: your next step toward a scalable content system

This n8n template is more than a shortcut for Instagram scheduling from Airtable. It is a foundation you can build on, combining automation with contextual intelligence through embeddings and a vector store.

Start small and steady:

  • Configure the webhook trigger and logging to Google Sheets.
  • Validate how the RAG Agent handles real captions from your Airtable base.
  • Once you trust the results, connect it to your scheduler or posting service.

From there, layer in approvals, moderation, analytics, and more advanced logic. Each improvement gives you back more time for strategy, creativity, and growth.

Ready to automate more of your work? Import this template into n8n, connect your credentials, and run a test webhook with a sample Airtable record. Use it as a starting point, then shape it into the content system your team needs.

Call to action: Try this workflow today, link it to your Airtable base, and watch your scheduling time drop dramatically. If you want support tailoring the workflow for direct Instagram posting or advanced moderation, reach out or schedule a demo.

Automate Industrial IoT KPI Emails with n8n

Automate Industrial IoT KPI Emails with n8n

This tutorial walks you through how to build an Industrial IoT KPI email automation in n8n using embeddings, a Redis vector store, and an AI agent that logs results to Google Sheets. You will see how incoming telemetry or KPI payloads are captured, embedded, stored, searched semantically, and finally turned into clear KPI emails for your operations team.

What you will learn

By the end of this guide, you will be able to:

  • Explain the architecture of an Industrial IoT KPI email workflow in n8n
  • Configure a webhook to receive KPI or telemetry data from your IIoT platform
  • Split and embed text, then store it in a Redis vector database
  • Use semantic search to retrieve relevant historical context for new KPI events
  • Set up an AI chat agent to generate KPI summary emails with recommendations
  • Log every email and its metadata to Google Sheets for auditing and analysis

Core concepts and architecture

Why this architecture for Industrial IoT KPI emails?

Industrial environments generate a large amount of telemetry and KPI data. The goal of this workflow is to surface that data in the form of timely, context-aware KPI emails that operations teams can actually use.

To achieve this, the architecture combines several key building blocks:

  • n8n for low-code workflow automation and orchestration
  • Text splitting to break long KPI messages or logs into smaller chunks for accurate embeddings
  • Embeddings (Cohere or similar) to convert KPI text into semantic vectors
  • Redis vector store to store and query those vectors at high speed
  • OpenAI or another LLM chat agent to generate or enrich KPI email content
  • Google Sheets to log each email and its metadata for audit, compliance, and reporting

In short, n8n coordinates the flow, embeddings and Redis provide semantic memory, and the LLM turns that memory into actionable KPI summaries.

High level workflow overview

The complete n8n workflow follows this logical sequence:

  1. Webhook receives KPI or telemetry payloads via HTTP POST.
  2. Text Splitter breaks long KPI messages or logs into smaller chunks.
  3. Embeddings (Cohere) generates a vector for each text chunk.
  4. Insert into Redis vector store to index vectors along with metadata.
  5. Query Redis to find semantically similar past events when needed.
  6. Tool and memory nodes expose the vector store to the agent and keep short term conversation history.
  7. Chat model and agent use the retrieved context to write a KPI email and suggested actions.
  8. Google Sheets logs the generated email and metadata for auditing and tracking.

Prerequisites

Before you start building this in n8n, make sure you have:

  • An n8n instance (self hosted or n8n cloud)
  • API keys for Cohere (or another embedding provider) and OpenAI (or another LLM)
  • A Redis instance that supports vector operations, or a compatible vector database endpoint
  • A Google account with Sheets API credentials (OAuth) with permission to append rows
  • Basic familiarity with webhooks and JSON payloads from your Industrial IoT platform

Step by step: building the workflow in n8n

This section walks through each major node in the n8n template and explains how to configure it. You can follow along in your own n8n instance or adapt these steps to your environment.

Step 1 – Capture KPI data with a Webhook node

The entry point of the workflow is a Webhook node that accepts KPI or telemetry payloads from your IIoT gateway or platform.

  • HTTP method: set to POST
  • Path: choose a clear path such as /kpi-ingest
  • Authentication: configure IP allowlisting, header tokens, or signatures as required by your security policies

Your IIoT platform will send JSON payloads to this webhook whenever a KPI event or anomaly occurs.

Step 2 – Split long KPI messages into chunks

Many IIoT payloads include long text fields such as logs, descriptions, or alert messages. To embed these effectively, you first need to split them into smaller pieces.

Add a Text Splitter node connected to the Webhook:

  • Select the text field to split, for example message or raw_message
  • Choose a splitting method such as character based or sentence based
  • Use typical settings like:
    • Chunk size: 400 characters
    • Chunk overlap: 40 characters

The overlap helps maintain context between chunks so the embeddings preserve meaning across boundaries.

Step 3 – Generate embeddings for each chunk

Next, convert each chunk into a semantic vector using a Cohere embeddings node (or another embedding provider supported by n8n).

Connect the Text Splitter output to an Embeddings (Cohere) node and configure:

  • The field that contains the chunk text
  • The appropriate embedding model name or size

For each chunk, the node returns a dense vector that captures the semantic content of the text. Make sure to keep the original chunk text and important metadata (such as device ID, timestamp, KPI name) in the node output so you can store everything together in the vector database.

Step 4 – Store vectors in a Redis vector database

With embeddings generated, the next step is to index them in Redis so you can perform semantic searches later.

Add a node that inserts into your Redis vector store and configure it to:

  • Use your Redis connection or credentials
  • Specify the index or collection name for KPI vectors
  • Store:
    • The embedding vector
    • The original chunk text
    • Metadata such as:
      • device_id
      • timestamp
      • kpi_name or KPI type

Indexing this metadata alongside the vectors is critical for later filtering and precise retrieval.

Step 5 – Query the vector store and expose it as a tool

Once your vector store has data, you can query it whenever a new KPI event arrives or on a schedule, for example for daily KPI summaries.

Add a Query (Redis) node that:

  • Takes a new KPI text input, such as the latest anomaly message
  • Embeds this input (often using the same embedding model) or uses a precomputed vector
  • Performs a similarity search against the stored vectors
  • Returns the most relevant historical events, descriptions, or documentation

In the n8n template, this vector store is exposed to the AI agent as a Tool. That means the agent can call this tool dynamically to retrieve supporting context whenever it needs more information to write a better KPI email.

Step 6 – Configure memory and the AI chat agent

To generate useful, context rich KPI emails, you will connect an LLM to an Agent node and give it access to both memory and the vector store tool.

Set up the following:

  • Memory buffer:
    • Use a memory node to keep a short history of recent messages and system prompts
    • This helps the agent maintain continuity between multiple KPI events or follow up questions
  • Chat model (OpenAI or similar):
    • Configure your API credentials
    • Choose a suitable chat model
    • Provide a clear system prompt, for example:
      • “You are an Industrial IoT KPI assistant. Generate concise, actionable KPI summaries and recommended next steps for operations teams.”
  • Agent node:
    • Connect the chat model
    • Enable the vector store tool so the agent can query Redis for relevant context
    • Attach the memory buffer so the agent can recall recent interactions

When triggered, the agent uses the incoming KPI data plus related historical context from the vector store to compose a clear KPI email with recommended actions.

Step 7 – Log generated emails to Google Sheets

The final step in the workflow is to keep an audit trail of all generated KPI emails and their key attributes.

Add a Google Sheets node configured to:

  • Use OAuth credentials with at least append access
  • Point to a specific spreadsheet and worksheet
  • Append a new row for each generated email including:
    • Email body or summary
    • Recipient or distribution list
    • Device ID and KPI name
    • Timestamp and any action taken

This sheet becomes a simple but powerful log that operations, reliability, or compliance teams can review later.

Sample KPI payload structure

To get the most out of this workflow, design your IIoT payloads so they include the key fields that are useful for filtering, context, and reporting.

A typical JSON payload might look like:

  • device_id
  • timestamp
  • kpi_name (for example bearing_temp_avg)
  • kpi_value and threshold values
  • raw_message or log snippet for embedding
{  "device_id": "pump-42",  "timestamp": "2025-08-01T12:00:00Z",  "kpi_name": "vibration_rms",  "kpi_value": 3.2,  "threshold": 2.5,  "message": "RMS vibration exceeded threshold for pump-42. Recent pattern: spike every 5 minutes."
}

Fields like device_id, timestamp, and kpi_name should be stored alongside embeddings in Redis so you can filter and interpret search results correctly.

Best practices for reliable KPI email automation

Metadata and indexing

  • Always index metadata such as device IDs, timestamps, KPI names, and severity levels alongside embeddings.
  • Use this metadata in your Redis queries to narrow results (for example, same device or similar time window).

Chunking strategy

  • Start with a chunk size around 400 characters and an overlap of about 40 characters, then adjust based on your data.
  • For very structured logs, you may experiment with line based or sentence based splitting instead of pure character based splitting.

Performance, rate limits, and batching

  • Batch embedding requests where possible to reduce API overhead and costs.
  • Monitor your embedding and LLM provider rate limits and back off or queue requests as needed.

Security considerations

  • Secure your webhook with signatures, tokens, and IP restrictions.
  • Store all API keys and secrets in environment variables or n8n credentials, not in plain text.
  • Restrict Redis access to trusted networks or use authentication and TLS.

Monitoring and error handling

  • Add error branches in n8n to capture failures in embedding generation, Redis operations, or Google Sheets writes.
  • Log errors to a dedicated monitoring tool or a separate sheet for quick debugging.

Troubleshooting common issues

  • Irrelevant embedding matches: Check the quality of the input text and your chunking settings. Noisy or very short chunks often produce poor matches. Increase overlap or clean up the text before embedding.
  • Slow Redis inserts or queries: This often points to network latency. Consider deploying Redis close to your n8n instance or using a managed Redis service optimized for vector workloads.
  • Missing rows in Google Sheets: Verify OAuth scopes, confirm you are using the correct spreadsheet and worksheet, and ensure the account has append permissions.
  • Unexpected or low quality agent output: Refine the system prompt, give clearer instructions, and ensure the agent is actually retrieving useful context through the vector store tool.

Scaling and production readiness

For high volume Industrial IoT environments, consider these production focused enhancements:

  • Managed vector database: Use Redis Enterprise or another managed vector database like Pinecone for higher throughput and resilience.
  • Asynchronous processing: Accept webhook events quickly, then push heavy embedding and indexing work to background workers or queues.
  • Cost optimization: Cache frequent queries, reuse embeddings when possible, and consider more cost efficient embedding models for high volume workloads.
  • Observability: Instrument your workflow with metrics such as success rate, average latency, and cost per processed event.

Example Industrial IoT use case

Imagine a manufacturing operations team that wants a daily KPI email summarizing anomalies and recommended actions.

With this n8n workflow in place:

  • The IIoT platform sends anomaly alerts to the webhook.
  • The workflow embeds the anomaly descriptions and stores them in Redis with device and KPI metadata.
  • For each new anomaly, the vector store is queried for similar past issues and their resolutions.
  • The LLM agent uses this context to generate a concise KPI email that:
    • Describes the current anomaly
    • Highlights similar historical events
    • Recommends immediate next steps for operators
  • Each email and its underlying context are logged to Google Sheets for postmortem reviews and regulatory documentation.

Recap and next steps

What you have built

You have seen how to design and implement an Industrial IoT KPI email pipeline in n8n that:

  • Ingests KPI payloads via a webhook
  • Splits and embeds KPI messages into semantic vectors
  • Stores and queries those vectors in a Redis based vector store
  • Uses an AI agent to generate contextual KPI emails with recommended actions
  • Logs every email and key metadata to Google Sheets for auditing

How to get started with the template

To try this in your own environment:

  1. Import the provided n8n workflow template into your n8n instance.
  2. Connect your Cohere (or other embedding) and OpenAI (or other LLM) API keys.
  3. Configure your Redis vector store connection and Google Sheets credentials.
  4. Send a sample KPI payload from your IIoT platform or a test tool to the webhook.
  5. Iterate on chunk sizes, prompts, and query filters until the KPI emails match your operational needs.

FAQ

Can I use a different

Calendar Event Auto-Tag with n8n and Weaviate

Calendar Event Auto-Tag with n8n and Weaviate

Ever stared at your calendar thinking, “What on earth is Project Sync – Final Final v3 and why did I tag it as ‘Other’ again?” If you are tired of manually tagging events, second-guessing what they were about, and living in fear of your own calendar filters, this workflow is for you.

In this guide, you will set up an automated calendar event tagging system using an n8n workflow that plugs into OpenAI embeddings and Weaviate. It takes your raw event data, stores it in a vector database, uses a RAG agent to figure out smart tags, logs the results in Google Sheets, and even pings Slack when something breaks. Think of it as a very polite robot assistant that loves metadata and never forgets a meeting.

What this n8n workflow actually does

At a high level, this calendar event auto-tag workflow in n8n:

  • Receives calendar event payloads through a Webhook Trigger
  • Splits long descriptions into chunks using a Text Splitter
  • Generates OpenAI embeddings for each text chunk
  • Stores those vectors in Weaviate as a vector store
  • Runs similarity queries to find related past events
  • Uses a RAG agent with memory to propose meaningful tags
  • Logs everything neatly into Google Sheets
  • Sends a Slack alert if something goes wrong

The result: consistent, searchable, analytics-friendly tags on your calendar events, without you repeatedly clicking dropdowns and wondering why “Internal” and “Team” are two separate tags.

Why bother auto-tagging calendar events?

Manual tagging is one of those tiny tasks that seems harmless until you are doing it for the 200th time in a week. Automation steps in to save your sanity and your team’s time.

Auto-tagging helps you:

  • Keep labels consistent across events, teams, and time zones
  • Improve search and filtering in calendars, CRMs, and reporting tools
  • Enable analytics based on standardized tags like “Sales”, “Interview”, or “Internal”
  • Reduce admin workload so humans can stop playing “Guess That Meeting” and do actual work

With this n8n workflow, you get a reusable, scalable pipeline that your future self will be very grateful for.

How the architecture fits together

The workflow is built around n8n as the automation engine and combines several tools into a single pipeline:

  • Webhook Trigger – receives incoming calendar event payloads (POST)
  • Text Splitter – breaks long event descriptions into chunks for better embeddings
  • OpenAI Embeddings – converts text chunks into vector representations
  • Weaviate Vector Store – stores those vectors and acts as a retrieval store
  • Weaviate Query + Vector Tool – fetches relevant context for new events
  • Window Memory – keeps short-term context for the RAG agent
  • RAG Agent – uses a chat model plus retrieved context to propose tags and analysis
  • Append Sheet (Google Sheets) – logs the RAG agent output to a Log sheet
  • Slack Alert – notifies your ops or data team when errors occur

Under the hood, this is a classic n8n workflow + vector store + RAG agentcalendar event auto-tagging.

Quick setup overview

Before diving into each node, here is the high-level flow from start to finish:

  1. Calendar sends event data to your n8n webhook
  2. Event text is split into chunks
  3. Chunks are turned into OpenAI embeddings
  4. Embeddings are saved in Weaviate with event metadata
  5. New events trigger similarity queries against Weaviate
  6. A RAG agent uses that context to decide tags
  7. Results are logged to Google Sheets
  8. Any errors fire a Slack alert

Now let us walk through each step in more detail so you can recreate the workflow in n8n.

Step 1 – Create the Webhook Trigger in n8n

Start by setting up the entry point for your data.

In n8n:

  • Add a Webhook node
  • Set the method to POST
  • Configure a path like /calendar-event-auto-tag
  • Secure it using an API key, IP whitelist, or your preferred security method

This webhook trigger is where your calendar provider or middleware sends event payloads. Each payload should include details like the title, description, attendees, times, and any other fields you want to use for tagging.

Step 2 – Split event text for better embeddings

Long event descriptions can be messy, especially when they include agendas, notes, or entire email threads. To keep embeddings accurate, you want to break them into smaller, overlapping pieces.

Add a Text Splitter node and configure it to chunk:

  • Event titles
  • Descriptions
  • Attendee lists or other relevant text fields

Recommended chunk settings:

  • Chunk size: 400 characters
  • Overlap: 40 characters

This chunking strategy helps the OpenAI embeddings capture context while staying consistent for insertion into the vector store.

Step 3 – Generate OpenAI embeddings for each chunk

Next, convert those text chunks into vectors that Weaviate can store and search.

In n8n:

  • Add an OpenAI Embeddings node
  • Use a model such as text-embedding-3-small
  • Make sure your OpenAI API credentials are correctly configured in n8n

Each chunk becomes a separate document with its own embedding. These embeddings are what power similarity search in your Weaviate vector store.

Step 4 – Insert vectors into Weaviate

Now that you have embeddings, it is time to store them in Weaviate so you can query them later.

Configure a Weaviate Insert node with:

  • An index (class) name like calendar_event_auto-tag
  • Fields for the embedding vector
  • Metadata fields such as:
    • event_id
    • source (calendar name or account)
    • start_time and end_time
    • original_text (the text chunk)

This metadata is extremely useful later when you want to filter, debug, or refine retrieval behavior.

Step 5 – Query Weaviate for similar events

Once vectors are in place, your workflow can start acting smart instead of just storing data.

When a new event comes in and you generate its embeddings, you can optionally:

  • Use a Weaviate Query node to search for similar past events
  • Return the top N similar documents based on vector similarity

Those retrieved documents give the RAG agent historical context. That way, if you have consistently tagged similar meetings as “Sales” or “Interview”, the agent can follow that pattern instead of reinventing your taxonomy every time.

Step 6 – Configure the RAG agent with memory and tools

This is where the magic happens. The RAG agent takes context from Weaviate, your event text, and your instructions, then outputs structured tags.

In n8n:

  • Set up Window Memory to keep short-term context for the agent
  • Connect the retrieved Weaviate results to a Vector Tool that the agent can call
  • Create a RAG Agent node using a chat model

In the agent’s system prompt, clearly state the goal. For example, you might instruct it to classify events into tags such as:

  • Meeting
  • Interview
  • Sales
  • Follow-up
  • Internal
  • Personal
  • Other

Also tell the agent to return output in clean JSON with tags and confidence scores. This keeps your workflow deterministic and easier to debug.

Recommended RAG agent prompt

{  "system": "You are an assistant that assigns consistent tags to calendar events. Use the provided context from past events when available. Reply only with valid JSON containing 'tags' (array of strings) and 'confidence' (0-1).",  "user": "Event: {{event_text}}\nContext: {{retrieved_context}}"
}

You can tweak the tag list or confidence behavior later, but this is a solid starting point for your calendar event auto-tag setup.

Step 7 – Log results and handle errors like a pro

Once the RAG agent has done its job, you want a permanent record of what it decided. That makes it easier to audit, retrain, or build dashboards later.

Add an Append Sheet node for Google Sheets and configure columns such as:

  • Timestamp
  • Event ID
  • Suggested Tags
  • RAG Agent Response (raw JSON output)

This gives you a running log of all classifications, perfect for analytics, QA, or training a future supervised model.

To keep operations smooth, also connect a Slack Alert node that triggers on errors. Send messages to an #alerts channel with error details so someone can jump in quickly when something breaks instead of discovering a silent failure two weeks later.

Design tips for reliability and performance

To keep your n8n workflow and vector store happy, consider these best practices:

  • Rate-limit the webhook consumer so calendar sync bursts do not overwhelm your workflow.
  • Normalize text before embeddings, such as lowercasing and removing punctuation, to improve similarity matching.
  • Persist a small semantic index of common tags to improve recall and keep classifications consistent.
  • Use schema.org-style metadata in stored documents so you can filter by event type, organizer, or other structured fields during retrieval.
  • Keep the RAG agent deterministic by enforcing a JSON schema and validating the response in n8n before writing to Sheets.

These small tweaks make your n8n workflow more predictable and easier to scale.

Troubleshooting common issues

Embeddings look irrelevant

If your similarity results feel random, check:

  • Your chunking strategy. Try adjusting chunk size (up or down from 400) and overlap.
  • That you are using the intended OpenAI embedding model and not a different one by mistake.

Weaviate insert or query fails

When Weaviate acts up, verify:

  • Network connectivity from n8n to your Weaviate instance
  • Credentials and API keys
  • That the Weaviate schema for calendar_event_auto-tag (or your chosen class name) exists and matches the metadata you are sending

RAG agent returns unstructured text

If your agent suddenly gets chatty and forgets the JSON rule:

  • Strengthen the system prompt to require strict JSON only
  • Add a JSON parse step in n8n and validate the response
  • On parse failure, route the output to a human review queue and send a Slack alert so someone can fix the event manually

Privacy, PII, and governance

Calendar data often includes personal information, so treat it carefully. Before sending anything to OpenAI or Weaviate:

  • Mask or redact sensitive fields like emails and phone numbers when required by your data policy
  • Align vector and log retention with your compliance rules
  • Make sure your use of third-party services matches your organization’s privacy and governance standards

Automation is great, but not at the cost of leaking your CEO’s private dentist appointments.

Extensions and next steps

Once your calendar event auto-tag workflow is running smoothly, you can extend it in several useful ways:

  • Write tags back to the calendar using your provider’s API after a quick verification pass.
  • Train a supervised classifier on the labeled data in Google Sheets to reduce reliance on model calls over time.
  • Build a review UI where admins can approve or edit suggested tags before they are saved.

This workflow is a flexible foundation for more advanced automation, analytics, and human-in-the-loop review flows.

Wrapping up

You now have an end-to-end design for a robust n8n workflow that:

  • Starts with a webhook trigger
  • Uses OpenAI embeddings and a Weaviate vector store
  • Leverages a RAG agent to classify calendar events
  • Logs outcomes to Google Sheets and alerts via Slack on errors

It scales with your data, integrates nicely with other tools, and dramatically cuts down on repetitive tagging work. You can adjust chunking, vector store capacity, and model choices as your usage grows, or plug in extra nodes for analytics, review, and calendar write-back.

To get started, set up your webhook and OpenAI credentials in n8n, then follow the steps above to wire in Weaviate, the RAG agent, Google Sheets logging, and Slack alerts. If you prefer not to build everything from scratch, you can use a ready-made n8n template and customize the prompts and schema to match your tagging strategy.

Call to action: Try this workflow on a test calendar for 7 days. Let it auto-tag your events, review the suggestions in Google Sheets, and refine the prompt and vector schema based on what you see. Need help? Book a consultation or grab the starter n8n template from our repo.